"Floor, will you please retire to the gallery, thank you. All right, the House will be in order. The invocation this morning will be by Dr. Richard J. Schultz, President of Concordia Theological Seminary in Springfield."
"I invite you to pray. God of men and of nations, the privilege of being summoned to debate and establish laws for the sensitively complex society of our times is a heavy wine for any mortal man, yet beneath the sheen of honor and importance, the burden of respon- sibility and accountability weighs heavily upon the soul of a man. For the obligations to one's conscience to his party, to the total citizenry are in delicate and fragile balance. ance. Therefore, we bespeak for each other this day, a divinely and grafted wisdom; a wisdom to be courageous. when we are sure we are right; a wisdom to be humble enough to know that we can profit from another man's point of view; a wisdom which is unique and rare in its ability to comprehend and sympathize with a variety of human conditions which this day depend upon the deliberations which shall here take place; and a wisdom which is aware of its own limitations and senses its need to apply to thee for gui- dance. In the name of Our Lord. Amen."
"Thank you, Dr. Schultz. Very nice to have met you. Un-huh. Roll call for attendance. Intro- duction and first reading of House Bills."
"House Bill 3571, Glass, et.al. Bill for GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 3. an act to amend 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3572, Houlihan, et.al. An act to make an appropriation to provide for the distribution there- of to certain local government governmental entity. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3573, Houlihan, et.al. Bill for an act to amend 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3574, Maragos. An act making an appropriation to James W. Farrow. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3575, Roscoe Cunningham. An act in relation to State acquisition, construction, control of horse racing and harness racing tracks. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3576, Roscoe Cunningham. A bill for an act to amend the 'Illinois Harness Racing Act'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3577, Schlickman. An act to amend Section 1 of 'An Act in relation to the employment of persons committed to county jail, house of corrections or workhouse'. First reading of the bill. Have we got any more?"
"All right, now, any members that have any bills on the calendar that they would desire to table, the Chair will be happy to recognize motions, so I would ah kindly ask you to look over the calendar. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, ah, with reference to House Bill 3556, which I filed yesterday, co-sponsored by Mr. Capparelli and Mr. Kosinski, appropriating a World War I bonus to a gentleman who did not make his application, I'd GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 4. like a unanimous consent to advance this bill to the order of second reading without reference to a committee."
"3556?"
"House Bill 3556."
"All right, da, that bill has is on the Speaker's table, it has not been referred to committee, so the gentleman is asking for unanimous consent to have that bill advanced from the Speaker's table to the order of second reading without reference to committee. Is there objection? What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Maragos rise?"
"I'll have a similar request. Another bill was just filed this morning after we finish. I have no objection to the request of this of ah Mr. Hyde.".
"I can understand why. All right, hearing no objection, the 3556 is advanced to the order of second reading. We've just been advised that Represent- ative John Downes is doing well very well ah at Edwards Hospital. They've been talked with this morning and ap- parently is a coming along all right. The gentleman from ah Cook, Mr. Maragos."
"Mr. Speaker, if there be no objection, I'd like for consent to a- advance House Bill 3574 to second reading without reference to committee. It's also an appropriation bill for a pension of $445.00 to a veteran who did not receive it in World War II."
"All right, is there objection? Hear- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5. ing none, the 3574 will be advanced from the Speaker's table to the order of second reading. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Maragos."
"Mr. Speaker, pursuant to your request at this time, I would like to table the series of bills of which I have been a House sponsor and are still in executive committee, and evidentially aren't going to get anywhere this session, so House Bill, I'd like to move to table House Bill 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665, and then also 668, 669, 670, -71, -72, and -73."
"All right."
"All the way to -74. 674 is the last one."
"All right, is there objection? If not, those bills will be tabled."
"Thank you."
"All right, ah, what purpose does the gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of personal privilege. Mr. Speaker, on June 28, 1970, a vote was taken in this House on the reapportionment bills presented by the Republican and Democratic parties. That vote was taken after an agreement on the floor of this House that both Republican and Democratic maps would be passed .."
"One, one, one, one moment, please."
". . . for the purpose of a last minute compromise."
"For what purpose does the gentleman GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 6. from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Well, Mr. Speaker, a point of order, I don't believe this is a point of personal privilege that the gentleman is raising. His name a he hasn't been mentioned in debate and ah, ah, I don't quite know what he is doing, but it certainly is not a point of personal privilege."
"I agree. The gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce."
"I don't take I don't take the time of this House if I'd be given a chance in a to come to that I'll come to that right now and I'll make it what the point is. The point is that my vote and that of a many members of this House, my name was used by the Counsel for the Speaker of this House and the Majority Leader in the United States District Court to assert the fact that I was supporting a certain congressional reapportionment matter, my name was used."
"One moment, now, the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde. Now, now, I'll get back to you."
"Now, Mr. Speaker, there is a matter pending before the United States District Court and the place to try that is in court and not on the floor of this legis- lature and if the distinguished gentleman who is addressing this body has any remarks to make about pending litigation, I think they're inopportune, they're inappropriate, and ah, he ought not to be permitted to continue along this line."
"I agree with the Majority Leader." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 7.
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, uh, Mr. Speaker, I sent a protest pursuant to House Rule 77."
"All right, now if you'll hold, let me. Is it up here at the Clerk's desk?"
"I filed it with the Clerk for entry in the Journal of this House pursuant to Rule 77, and I hope you'll do that in today's Journal, enter that protest."
"All right, let us take a look at it here. For what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Well, Mr. Speaker, and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I am objecting to the distinguished gentle- man from Lake's alleged protest being filed under Rule 77 or under any other Rule, because Rule 77 says 'any two members shall have the liberty to dissent from and protest in respectful language against any legislative act or re- solution'. Now, ah, the protest filed by the distinguished gentleman in fact protests the use of certain roll calls by of this House in court, but it does not protest any legis- lative act. The legislative act that he is concerned about was in last June 28th, and the protest that makes no ah, ah, objection to that legislative act, but rather the a- lleged improper use of the roll call later on in a court proceeding. Now that, the proper place for him to lodge his protest is in that court proceeding which in fact he has done and which is was supposed to have been heard to- morrow, but I understand is now continued, and this protest GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8. does not fit within the confines of Rule 77, in that it does not object to any legislative act. Furthermore, Mr. Speaker, the language is not respectful, because in item #7, it uses the phrase 'a brazen attempt to mislead the court'. So on those two grounds, not to mention the in- accuracies that are in the protest, I object to it's being filed and made a part of the records of this House."
"Does the gentleman from Lake care to answer the objections raised by the Majority Leader, ah?"
"Yes, Mr. Speaker, the first item in the protest, does protest and object to a what happened on in this legislature, not in court. It starts out 'pursuant to House Rule 77, we're hereby respectfully dissent and protest from one the manner by which this House was induced to pass House Bill 2907 containing the Republican Congres- sional Reapportionment Map and then too from the action of the Speaker and the Majority Leader who represented to the Court, that we had approved the Republican Map in House Bill 2907. So there's there's two elements. One, the element of inducement. We members were induced to vote for the map on the grounds to keep legislative apportionment alive, not even talking about congressional, which was in the same bill. And two, after we were induced to vote for it on the floor of the House, our vote was then entered ah, by the Speaker and the Majority Leader as evidence in the United States District Court which found that that had pro- bative value in upholding the the Republican Congressional GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF. ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 9. Map. And was argued, too, by attorney for the Speaker, that there was legitimacy, the map had the legitimacy of having passed the House of Representatives by an over- whelming vote, so the protest is based on the inducement, we were induced to vote for a bill on the idea that it would not have any substance or merit, and yet, it they went into court and said it did have substance and merit, that we voted for the congressional reapportionment pre- sented by the Speaker and the Majority Leader."
"What for what purpose does the gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Well, now, Mr. Speaker, the gentleman is go- ing on and on, and saying things on the floor of this House that are objectionable, are improper, are out of order; he's making an argument that he ought to try to make to the court, if he can. Now, much of what he says is not so, it's not true, and he can't segregate the allegedly proper parts of this protest, which I frankly don't see any, from the grossly improper part and so I again state that it's improper, and I object to his being granted leave to file this protest, and I move that the the filing of this be rejected."
"All right, I have read the document that has been handed to the Clerk by the gentleman from Lake, and ah, I have looked at Rule 77 and I've entertained the arguments advanced by the Majority Leader, and I feel that his points are well taken, inasmuch as 77 is just GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 10. with regard to legislative acts or resolutions, and I think that this quite clearly is not in that area. So, it will be the Chair's ruling that this is not a protest that com- plies with the requirements of Rule 77 and for that reason, this will not be entered upon the Journal. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Katz rise?"
"Mr. Speaker and Mr. Majority Leader, I rise to comment briefly if I might concerning the matter here before the House. I am not so much concerned about the technical problem of Rule 77. I am concerned about the fact, Mr. Speaker and Mr. Majority Leader, that you are our Speaker and you are our Majority Leader, and I am very concerned and was very concerned and embarrassed, I might add, in my district and elsewhere, with reference to repres- entations that were made ..."
"One, one moment, what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Now, Mr. Speaker, the distinguished gentle- man now speaking knows well this is a matter that's in court and I reiterate it's highly improper for anyone, es- pecially a lawyer and a member of the Bar, to discuss with legislative privilege on the floor of this House, a matter pending in court. The gentleman is represented in court, he has an attorney, he has filed petitions and affidavits in court, and I submit that this is an attempt and an effort to influence that proceeding and is in itself improper and the gentleman knows better and I suggest that he not be GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF 'REPRESENTATIVES 11. permitted to continue in this line of discussion while this matter is pending in court, and I request he direct his re- marks to the court and not on the floor of this House."
"Your, your point's well taken. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"Mr. Speaker, a three judge Federal Court has attempted to reapportion the State of Illinois for the congressional districts. ."
"One, one moment, please. For what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Well, a point of order, I don't know that this is the U.N. or what, but I see, I don't know on what point the gentleman is rising. He's making a speech now, much in the vein of his two predecessors and just as ob- jectionable."
"For what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea desire recognition?"
"Mr. Speaker, I was attempting to explain why and if the Majority Leader for some reason doesn't want to get this on the floor of this House, maybe there's some- thing wrong, but I was before a three Fed-, three judge Federal Court. I watched, I read an opinion by that court, that court. ."
"What, what, what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"I think the floor of this House, Mr. Speaker, is an inappropriate place to hold a press conference while GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 12. we're in session, and I would suggest the gentleman do that after we have adjourned, but there is no not no business before the House, and interested as I am in any remarks the distinguished Assistant Minority Leader makes, I object to these, as improper and bearing on a case that is now pending."
"I agree. Now, ah, you're going to have to raise a specific point. I'll rule on that, but I'm not going to get into debate. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea, has the floor."
"Mr. Speaker, what I've attempted to try to do is say that a court based its opinion on alleged acts of this body. "
"You're, we're not going to, you're out of order, sir, I'm sorry. What purpose is the gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Maragos rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, for my information, I'm asking a point of parliamentary inquiry. Since, in your interpretation of Rule 77, when is an act of a legislator ever to be reprimanded especially under the cover, if it's going to court, can it be, can this body reprimand an act of another legislator? Can it censure its own members?"
"I'm not going to deal in, you know, theoretic, I am not going to answer theoretical questions, now, if you've got a specific point that you want to raise, then I'll rule on that, but I'm going to, I'm not going to engage in debate." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 13.
"I'm not asking to debate, Mr. Speaker, I'm asking a question here, because . ."
"All right, I have ruled with regard to this so-called protest under Rule 77, and the way to challenge my ruling on this, is you all know, is to attempt to over-rule the ruling of the Speaker. Now that's your action. If you want to do that, why, you know, that's your choice. The gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, would I be in order filing objection and protest to your ruling preventing my objection from being entered in the Journal?"
"Well, is your second protest under Rule 77? The gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, yes, it would be under Rule 77, I would object and protest to your ruling on the floor against journalizing the objection of protests that was filed with the Clerk this morning."
"Well, this is in my ruling is that Rule 77 is not the place to attempt to counteract the Chair's ruling with regard to this protest that you have placed up here with the Clerk for consideration, but it is an motion to over-ride the Chair. The gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, I did originally arise on a point of personal privilege, my name having been used in the U.S. District Court, as approving the congressional remap. Can't I speak on the point of personal privilege, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 14. my name having been used in a legislative act by the 'Counsel for the Speaker and Majority Leader and Chairman of the Reapportionment Committee, as one who supported that very very part of some congressional reapportionment map? That is my point of personal privilege, I would like to have the floor to speak and oppose, because my constituents were given the impression that I favored that. . ."
"One, one moment, please. The gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Now, Mr. Speaker, I admire the persistence of the distinguished gentleman from Lake, but he continues to attempt to influence a pending matter in court, and he should address his remarks to the court, and I would ask the Speaker to restrict the gentleman from any further re- marks along this line. They are grossly improper for a lawyer, especially, and I ask that he not be permitted to continue on this line."
"I agree and the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Union, Mr. Choate."
"Well, Mr. Speaker, at least by innuendo I feel that my position, at least, which would be my name, was mentioned in the testimony by especially Representative Madigan and I would feel therefore, that I might address myself briefly to this question, from the standpoint of personal privilege. And I am looking at some of the evidence that was talked about as far as the court is concerned.
"All right, one, one moment, please. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 15. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, I am loath to object to any- thing that the distinguished Minority Leader says, but the facts are still the same, this is a matter pending in court and what they have to say here had best be directed to the court and not on the floor of this House. The matter is pending, it's highly improper to attempt to influence that decision while it is pending and and the same thing that was wrong with Mr. Pierce's remarks and Mr. Shea's remarks are likewise wrong with Mr. Choate's remarks, and I object to him discussing this as a matter of personal privilege or anything else. I think it's improper."
"Well, I think the Majority Leader's point is well taken. Now, for what purpose does the gentle- man from Union, Mr. Choate rise?"
"Well, Mr. Speaker, as far as the Majority Leader saying that this should not be brought forth on the floor of this House, may I point out to the Majority Leader that what we're talking about, and he full well realizes that I'm not an attorney and I'm not going to go before the courts, unless they call me, as some kind of a witness, as far as the testimony would be concerned, and I would hope they would, but what we are talking about is House action. I'm not talking about what the court is going to do or has done or might do, but I'm talking about what you all talked about was the activities and the action of this House and I'm saying to you that it was taken out of context, that GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 16. it was misrepresented and that as far as my vote on that particular bill was concerned, the truth about my vote was not told, because it was through an agreement of bi- partisan leadership of this House, which you was a part of, Mr. Majority Leader. Now, we agreed to pass this bill to the Senate for a vehicle and a vehicle only, for state legislative reinforcement, notwithstanding congressional reinforcement. And when we went in there, I say. ."
"Now, now, now, now, could you hold it just just a minute. The gentleman from the gentleman from the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Well, now, Mr. Speaker, what the distinguish- ed Minority Leader is really objecting to is not the vote in this House, the record speaks for itself, but the action that was taken in court when that vote was presented to the court, now that's what he's objecting to and he's trying to do indirectly what he can't do directly, and that's dis- cuss the case on the floor of this House while it's still pending. Now parenthetically, I wasn't a part of any agree- ment, I didn't discuss reapportionment with a single soul in this House and the your affidavits that are on file and your remarks are just as inaccurate as your appraisal of what the law is. But I submit that this is an improper effort to influence a pending court case and if the dis- tinguished gentlemen want to hold press conferences from here until dooms day, let them do so, but not take up the time of this House in such improper fashion. And I object GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES to continually permitting the gentlemen to continue along this line because it's highly improper."
"Your point is well taken and the gentleman is ah, for what purpose does the gentleman from Union, Mr. Choate rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, I wish to object, I wish to object the same as the Majority Leader did, to his dis- cussing what I'm attempting to discuss."
"Now wait a minute, 'til I think about that one here."
"But let me point out to the Majority Leader that I'm not attempting to argue any case. I'm attempting to correct the fact that the vote that I cast on this par- ticular bill was taken out of context as far as the state- ment that was presented to the courts is concerned. Be-.. cause I voted for that bill with a gentleman and a legis- lative understanding, to provide a vehicle for state legis- lative reapportionment in the waning hours, in the waiting hours of this legislative session. That's what I'm attempt- ing to point out, without any consideration for congression- al reapportionment, contrary to what has been said."
"All right, all right, all right, all right, very good, now back to the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Well, Mr. Speaker, ah, they're going to be very persistent and I'll just continue persisting in my objections, and I think we ought to have a ruling from GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 18. the Chair that this line of discussion is inappropriate and should be foreclosed."
"The, with regard to the comments of the gentleman from Union, and the objections thereto by the gentleman from Cook, ah, the Chair's ruling will be that the gentleman from Cook's objections are in order and, now, is the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea, desire recognition?"
"Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of personal privilege."
"Well, get started, and we'll see how far you go."
"I filed an affidavit for the Federal Dis- trict Court and Mr. Hyde has just told me. . ."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr., no, the gentleman is entitled to recognition, for what purpose is that?"
"Well, Mr. Speaker, we're going to continue to talk about the case in the Federal District Court. The distinguished Assistant Minority Leader ought to try his case there and not here. I object to any remarks about pending litigation in the United States District Court."
"And my ruling is in favor of that, the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"But the distinguished Majority Leader just said that the affidavit I have filed is inaccurate, and I object to that remark and I would wish to read the affidavit GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 19. to this House. It does not mention his name, it does not mention any act that he might know about. . ."
"All right, the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, my reference was not to the affidavit, one of several that were filed that were filed by the distinguished Assistant Minority Leader, he did not mention my name, and, of course, I did not mean him, so there is no need for him to read his affidavit, which, of course, is another effort to try the case here."
"I agree. Do you have anything further Mr. Shea?"
"In other words, the Majority Leader, is agreeing that my affidavit is true and correct?"
"I won't dignify that remark by reply, I'11 just shake my head 'no'."
"What purpose is the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Mann rise?"
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, this is not a point of personal privilege, just a parliamentary inquiry. Ah, what would the procedure be for getting a copy of the tape recording this just past debate?"
"Well, it'll certainly be available to the public in due course, and I'd suggest that in that if you're interested in a copy, that you, as a member, cer- tainly would be entitled to have one. We're just starting the process of this, and a girl is going to be typing up GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 20. the transcript from the tape."
"Thank you, thank you, Mr. Speaker."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Davis, for what purpose do you rise?"
"Legislative inquiry from the distinguished lawyer, the Majority Leader here. Can the courts rob any member of this House, even though a case is under consid- eration, from making a privilege statement on the floor of the House?"
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"The the I'll I'll be glad to give you my opinion, as a lawyer. The answer is no, you can say any- thing you want on the floor of this House. The question as to whether you ought to is another matter, and I say you ought not to while the case is pending."
"There's one thing. Now, now, I appreciate the it, but this puts you in the light of ruling on what ought to and what ought to not to have been done."
"Right. Ah, with the permission of the membership, let's pause for regrouping and we'll go into introduction and first reading of House Bills, and we'll, I'll recognize you as we move along."
"House Bill 3578, Epton. Bill for an act to add section to 'The Insurance Code'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3579, Epton. An act relating to the scheduling of appointments by servicemen and making the nonperformance of appointment agreements a criminal offense. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 21. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3580, Choate, et. al. An act to apportion the State of Illinois into 24 Congressional districts. First reading of the bill. Ah, no further bills. House Bill 3581, Redmond, et.al. Bill for an act to amend 'The School Code'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3582, Kenny Miller. Bill for an act to amend 'The Revenue Act'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3583, Houde, et.al. Bill for an act to amend the solicitation and collection of funds for charitable purposes act. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3584, Bradley, et.al. Bill for an act to amend 'The Election Code'. First reading of the bill."
"All right, with leave of the House, we'll go to a messages from the Senate. We have a couple of amendatory matters. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea rise?"
"Mr. Mr. Speaker, with regards to House Bill 3580, filed this morning by Representative Choate, myself, I would now move that the bill be moved to the order of second reading, without reference to a committee, and ask, or actually what I want to do is suspend Rule 38, so that it can be moved to the order of second reading without a reference to a committee and I would like to explain why I want it done."
"Well, we could expedite these things, probably if you'd discuss it privately with the Majority Leader, and so we could say it's a matter from our stand- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES point would be able to be moved right along, rather than taking time on the floor."
"Well, then could we have a five minute re- cess to the House while I discuss it. ."
"I'm sure that the Majority Leader would be happy to talk with you about it."
"Well, it is congressional remap and I feel that this House did not do its duty in remapping the con- gressional districts. .".
"My selection of the person to discuss it with you from my leadership list was a good one, then. Mr. Hyde will discuss it with you. Messages from the Senate."
"Message from the Senate by Mr. Wright, Secretary. Mr. Speaker, I am directed to inform the House of Representatives that pursuant to the recommendations of the Governor, the Senate has adopted amendatory provisions to a bill of the following title in the adoption of which I am instructed to ask the concurrence of the House. Senate Bill Number 262. A bill for an act to amend Sections 2 and 3 and the title of an act in relation to the performance of medical or surgical procedures on minors, approved August 17, 1961, as amended. The amendment is as follows: on page 1, line 13, by striking 'dental'; and on page 1, line 14 and 15, by striking 'or a dentist licensed to practice dentistry' and inserting in lieu thereof, 'or a dental pro- cedure by a licensed dentist'; and on page 1, lines 22 and 23, by striking 'or a dentist licensed to practice dentistry; GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and on page 1, line 23, by inserting the following language immediately after 'aid', 'or a licensed dentist renders emergency dental treatment'. Action taken by the Senate, October 12, 1971. Kenneth Wright, Secretary. Message from the Senate by Mr. Wright, Secretary. Mr. Speaker, I am directed to inform the House of Representatives that pur- suant to the recommendations of the Governor, the Senate has adopted amendatory provisions to a bill of the follow- ing title: Senate Bill Number 262. A bill for an ac to amend Sections 2 and 3 and the title of 'An Act in relation to the performance of medical or surgical procedures on minors'."
"All right, they a message from the Senate that was just read had reference to an amendatory veto action by the Senate. That will appear on the cal- endar tomorrow under Amendatory Vetoes, and the House then can determine the action it desires to take, with regard to the Senate action. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Yourell rise?"
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, an inquiry of the Chair."
"State your point."
"Ah, this has been a matter of some concern not only to myself, but other members of the House as well. An inquiry has to do with the position of the bills that are presently residing in the committees of this House, as to the action taken or not taken on those bills, before the end of this session of the General Assembly. Now, if those GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES bills are not acted upon in committee by the adjournment date of this session, will those bills be carried on the calendar and reside in those committees at the opening of the session in 1972?"
"Well, the Rules Committee is going to be in session, I think, practically every day as we address ourselves to this veto problem. We have not taken up this problem that you have raised, but we will, ah, and advise the House at that time." ."
"Is there, is there, then, Mr. Speaker, a deadline that these bills that are residing in committee must come out of committee during this fall session.
"Yes, there, the rules that we're going to adopt shortly here today, do provide a a time table, for floor action on on bills that reside in committee now, but that does not direct itself to a what happens to those bills that are in committee, if they're not, if they don't come out and are considered on the floor. We are going to take that out."
"Well, does that does that include also the bills that are being introduced in this session, or does that include all the bills that presently reside in com- mittee. Those bills, I am specifically speaking of, are those bills that were placed in committee, prior to ad- journment on July 1st, or June 30th of this year."
"All the bills ah will be treated treated in the same category, once they're in the committee, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 25. including bills that are introduced now, and as you know, the rules we're about to adopt provide for tomorrow, will be the last day for introduction of bills, if they are to be considered before January 1 of next year."
"Thank you."
"All right, with leave of the House, we'll go to the message from the Senate."
Senate Fredric B. Selcke: "A message from the Senate by Mr. Wright, Secretary. Mr. Speaker, I am directed to inform the House of Representatives that pursuant to the recommendations of the Governor, the Senate has adopted amendatory provisions to a bill of the following title in the adoption of which, I am instructed to ask the concurrence of the House. Bill Number 458. A bill for an act to amend Section 8 of the 'Motor Fuel Tax Law', approved March 25, 1929, as amend- ed. The amendment is as follows: Amend Senate Bill 458 on page 2, line 20, by striking '$500,000.00' and insert- ing in lieu thereof '$200,000.00'. Action taken by the Senate, October 12, 1971. Kenneth Wright, Secretary."
"With leave of the House, we'll go to Resolutions. The Chair recognizes the gentleman."
"House Resolution 400, Hyde."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, House Resolution 400 em- bodies rule changes, and I want to emphasize to the member- ship that these are temporary rules so that we can proceed with the business of the House during this session, the GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 26. Rules Committee is in virtual constant session, we're going to, we met this morning, we met twice yesterday, we're going to meet tomorrow morning, and so these rules are simply to permit us to move forward. Now you should have copies of the rule changes on your desk and I will point out to you the significant changes. The order of business, Number 17 is the only new item, and that is makes motions with respect to vetoes in order of business. Number 17. Ah, on page Roman Numeral Six where it is bills, it simply changes the ratio from 2/3 to 3/5. The same thing on Roman Numeral Seven, it changes, that's Rule 53b, it changes it from 2/3 to 3/5, and on page 2 of the regular numeral two, I trust you have a corrected copy. In any event, they are self-explanatory, and I would move for the adoption of House Resolution 400, which incorporates the rule changes."
"What purpose is the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Schlickman, rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, would the gentleman re- spond to a question?"
"He indicates he will."
"Representative, on Roman Numeral Six, entitled 'Bills', Section 51, there is a provision that there shall be an emergency clause in a bill. Now, under the new constitution, effective July 1, of this year, no reference is made to emergency clauses, rather in Section 10, entitled 'Effective Dates of Laws', of the Legislative GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 27. Article, Article IV, there is the statement that a bill passed after June 30, shall not become effective prior to July 1 of the next calendar year unless the General Assembly by the vote of 3/5 of the members elected to each House provides for an an earlier effective date. Now, the old constitution, the 1870 Constitution, did make reference to emergency clauses. Since the new constitution, which is now in effect doesn't make reference to emergency clauses, it simply says you can't have an earlier effective date, so long as that there is such a provision. In the bill, I wonder why we are carrying over to this time that now antiquated requirement? I should further like to say, Mr. Speaker, and to the gentleman, respected gentleman from Cook, that an emergency clause is window dressing, it's rationalization and in most instances just sheer garbage."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Without a hearing to the colorful language of the distinguished gentleman, I want to agree with him in substance, that I think the word 'emergency' is a no longer necessary under the new constitution, and the sub- stance of the rule really means that unless otherwise specified in the bill, a then the regular effective date will ah take will obtain, and so the substance of the rule is correct, but I would agree the word 'emergency' in the use of the phrase is a no longer necessary, and this will be one of the matters that we will clean up in our on-going revision of these rules." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 28.
"The only change a in Rule 51 as we're proposing to make it, is simply a switch in 2/3 to 3/5, and the rule, otherwise, is identical with that which has maintained and we will as a Minority and Majority leaders indicated, correct that particular language. The gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Schlickman."
"Well, then I would understand that despite the new constitution and at a time when we are amending Section 51, that there will still be required in any bill to be passed and to be effective before next July 1, a justification for why it should go into effect before July 1. The establishment of an emergency, some rationalization, some language, indicating why it can't wait for its effective date until July 1, 1972. Rather, as is provided for under the new constitution, all we have to say is that the bill will be effective on such and such a date, and that's it."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Again, accepting the gentleman's remarks, let me allay his fears only for one day, will that dif- ficult situation obtain? We'll work on this tonight, and it'll be changed, I'm sure, by tomorrow, but we must adopt some rules and to move forward."
"I think one of the things that should be taken into consideration when we do that, is the fact that if there isn't some indication in the bill that the sponsor desires a 3/5 vote, ah then every time somebody GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES stands up the Chair is going to be in a devil of a spot saying, you know, shall this bill pass with a 3/5 vote or shall it pass. with a constitutional majority, and if there isn't some indication in the bill about that, it's going to be a problem, so whether it's couched as an emergency or something else, there should be something in the bill, it's that simple. All right, is there any other discussion? The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Maragos."
"Mr. Speaker, I'd like to ask the Majority Leader if he could advise me that whether the objection of the Governors on all the vetoes whether they be what form of vetoes they may have been, have been already entered in the House Journal and what date they were entered in so we will know when the fifteen days run."
"I answered that specific question yesterday, asked by B. B. Wolfe, and I indicated that every, each and every objection of the Governor was journal- ized on October 5. So the expiration for any desired action as we're calling it, would be midnight, next Wed- nesday, October the 20th. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Simmons."
"Well, Mr. Speaker, I can't see anything so terribly objectionable to the word "emergency'. We have been become accustomed to what it means in this House and if it means that it need a 3/5 vote, I don't see why we can't continue the use of the word 'emergency', rather than to get into some new type of language. And I agree GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES with the remarks of the Speaker, that there should be some indication when a bill does require more than 89 votes, and I for one, for what good it is, would recommend to the Rules Committee that we retain the word 'emergency'.
"The gentleman from ah, Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe."
"Ah, will the Majority Leader yield to a question or two concerning the new rules?"
"Majority Leader indicates that he will yield to a question."
"In Section 96, the procedure for over- riding a veto and restoring vetoed items, etc., a member must file a written motion with the Clerk. Does that mean that the written motion may be filed any time within the fifteen day period allowed by the constitution, or is there going to be a rule of this House, that such motion shall be filed in advance, like the first three days, for example, so that the Speaker for the House would know what is going to be contested and what is not going to be con- tested?"
"The answer to this sir, is as the rules are now constituted, any time within the fifteen days. Now, if we adopt such a rule as you have alluded to, then that will necessarily be changed. That provision which you mentioned is under consideration, has not yet been accepted."
"All right, one more question, Mr. Majority Leader. Does it also mean that if we do not intend to ah GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 31. undertake undertake a vote on the Governor's veto, for example, I have three bills that were vetoed by the Gov- ernor, two of them I agree with, do I have to make a motion to strike it from the calendar, so that it's removed and it doesn't clutter our calendar, or the mere fact that I don't file within fifteen days indicates that it it's not going to be heard?"
"It will expire at the end of the fifteen days and that's the appropriate action."
"That might not necessarily be so, but, but, . ."
"I'd like to move, Mr. Speaker, on those two bills, if I'm in order at this time, or after the vote has been taken on the adoption of the new rules, to strike the two bills that I have no consideration for, so that this calendar can shape up to what it's going to be on a contested matter and not continue to carry vetoed bills that a a sponsor or a member of this House does not intend to contest."
"Are these bills under the total vetoed category?"
"Yes, under Total Vetoed captions. I'd like to have . ."
"Yeah, yeah, well, on on Total Veto items, as the Majority Leader did indicate, if the motions aren't filed, ah, and then acted upon as they would have to be prior to midnight next Wednesday, October the 20th, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 33. House Bill 1516, with regard to which a motion has been filed. It's under Motions under Amendatory Vetoes."
"Motion. Pursuant to Paragraph (e) of Section 9 of Article IV, the Constitution of 1970, I move the House accept this specific recommendation to change as to House Bill 1516 as set forth in the Governor's message of September 27, 1971. Clerk informed the Senate thereof and requested that the Senate concur herein. Gale Williams."
"All right, on that motion, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Jackson, ah, Mr. Williams. Now, would the House please be in order and address itself, we are about to take our first action on one of the Gov- ernor's vetoes. It is an Amendatory Veto, it will require a constitutional majority of 89 votes, and the Chair does recognize now, the gentleman from Jackson, Mr. Williams."
"Mr. Speaker, and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I just filed a motion and I would move that we accept the Governor's recommendations for the changes in House Bill 1516, which was the teachers salary bill. What the changes were, it reduced the amount that we passed from $6,500.00 for a non-degree to $6,000.00, and for a Bachelors Degree we passed it at $7,200.00, reduced to $6,800.00, and a Master's Degree they reduced it from $7,900.00 to $7,300.00, and also added, it must comply with the wage price freeze issued by the President of the United States. And under those conditions, I would move to adopt the recommendations GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES by the Governor."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"Mr. Speaker, I I'm of the understanding that any suggestions for changes to acts passed by the General Assembly would have to be in amendment form, that we would have an opportunity to see how the amendment amends the bill and have an opportunity to vote on it. Now, I have no amendment to the House Bill 1516 on my desk, I would like to have that amendment before I am required to vote on it."
"The amendment is contained in the Governor's message, and the Governor's message is on every members desk."
"But, Mr. Speaker, I you know, I don't know, but we amend acts by amendments, and I would think that we would have to specifically by line and page number amend the act that was passed by this General Assembly and sent to the Governor over the signature of the Speaker of my House and the Lieutenant Governor."
"Well, the motion that is has been filed does have attached to it, an amendment in the usual amendment form, outside of the Governor's message, and we're resolving right now, if that is an amendment to the en- rolled and engrossed bill. In which event, if it is, then having the actual amendment before you, with re-, in order to collate it with anything, you'd actually have to have the enrolled and engrossed bill before you. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 35.
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, I I have a xeroxed copy of what reports to be an Amendatory Veto by the Governor, but it's my understanding the rules, the joint rules of this House, or this General Assembly, require when bills are amended or changed, that the words that are stricken will be stricken and the new language will be underlined, etc., etc., and I think that it would be a wise procedure for us to set up similar machinery which regards to the Amendatory Vetoes, because as you well know, the Attorney General's opinion, talks about conforming with the Gov- ernor's wishes and the sponsor of the bill may wish to change one or two words and still be a conforming and let it be up to the Governor whether he wants to say that that language conforms or not."
"All right, the question you raise is answered in the amendment that is attached to the motion. The amendment has been drawn by the Reference Bureau in accordance with the House rules, and the language that is being added is underlined, and language that's being taken out is stricken. Now, if you are requesting that a copy of the exact thing be put on the desk, then we will now start to have 177 copies of these run off and put on the desk, before we vote. Is that your request?"
"Well, I just, Mr. Speaker, all I want to do is make sure that if we get a copy of the enrolled and en- grossed bill and the motion that we can match the two of them up to see exactly how the enrolled and engrossed bill GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES will look with the changes."
"All right, the exact bill is on the desk. Attached to the Governor's veto message. The en- rolled and engrossed bill is on your desk, attached to the Governor's veto message. Now, the only thing you don't have on your desk is a copy of the Reference Bureau's draft of the amendment concerning the specific recommendations in ...the Governor's veto message. We're going to adjourn now and during the recess, why, we'll have copies made of those amendments, drafted by the Reference Bureau, with regard to the motions that have been filed, and those will then be placed on the desks and then you will be able to look at the amendment with the enrolled and engrossed bill. Now will that satisfy you?"
"Now, the enrolled and engrossed bill, or a copy thereof, will be available at the Clerk's Office?"
"You've got it on your desk right now. It's attached to the Governor's veto message. There is supposed to be."
"I don't have it, but maybe I've misplaced it."
"There's a whole packet, Jack advises me, on every members desk. The gentleman from McLean, Mr. Bradley."
"Mr. Speaker, it might help, most of these packages are not on the desk, they're under the desk.
"Oh, all right. Under, rather than over. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 37. All right, that, what we'll do then during the recess is to have copies made of the exact Reference Bureau amend- ment language concerning the specific recommendations. You can then take that and look at the enrolled and en- grossed bill, so you'll be able to see exactly what's happening. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde.'
"Mr. Speaker, ah, I move now that this House stand in recess until the hour of 2:00 P.M. this afternoon.'
"We will take the motion of the gentle- man from Jackson out of the record, we will return to that at 2:00 P.M. with the amendments then on the desks for consideration at that time. All right, the House will now be in recess until the hour of 2:00 P.M. this afternoon." Recess at 11:55 O'Clock A.M. Return at 2:00 O'Clock P.M.
"Now, when we recessed, we were on the order of motions under Amendatory Vetoes on the second page of the calendar. The question raised by the gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Shea, I understand from the Clerk, has been satisfied over the recess. The specific amendments have now been placed on the members' desks. The gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Shea, for what purpose do you rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, I think that if the members will look at the Governor's message and the amendment to engrossed House Bill 1516, you can see the reason for my GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 38. question this morning. In the amendment, the suggested amendment to House Bill 1516 in line 6, we are talking about raising the figure from $6,600.00 to $7,300.00 and the Governor's message accompanied his return of that bill to this body, he suggested $7,900.00 and that that's one of the reasons that I raised it this morning when Repres- entative Williams mentioned the fact. He mentioned $7,300.00. The message said $7,900.00 in that specific point, and I wanted to make sure what I was going to vote on. And at an appropriate time, I would like to discuss with Repres- entative Williams, Section 2 that he wishes to add."
"The official copy is 73."
"Well, I have a copy that reports to have the Governor's signature on it under date September 21 or 27th, 1971, that was from the Secretary of State's Office, that has $7,900.00 on it."
"What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Simmons rise?"
"On the xeroxed copy that I have, it has $7,300.00 on it. I would also like to ask a question when the appropriate time comes. Ah, Mr. Speaker, if it if Mr. Shea's question has been answered, I would like to ask a question.
"Yes."
"This bill originally had Amendment Num- ber One adopted on it. Now, this amendment we're consider- ing today doesn't have a number on it, although it does GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES say as amended engross House Bill, which may cover that point. Now, my question is, should this be a Amendment Number One on the engross bill, because someone else may want to offer another amendment, and they probably should have numbers on them."
"All right, the gentleman from a, your point will be taken under advisement. The distinction we have here is that these are not really legislative amend- ments, they're executive amendments, and, ah, it's, the gentleman from Jackson, Mr. Williams."
"Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, my motion that I made or filed yesterday and ask for it to be adopted today is not any amendment or allow- ing any other amendments to this bill. My motion simply asks that we accept the Governor's recommendation to House Bill 1516."
"All right, with leave of the House, we'll go back to a the gentleman's motion from Cook, re- garding House Bill 3, what's the number of that bill on your congressional remap? Three, what? Yeah, a turn the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea, three?"
"Mr. Speaker, the bill that was introduced this morning for congressional remap was House Bill 3580."
"All right, we'll take the House Bill from the records, 1516 while we're further clarifying the question of the a Governor's message and consider the gentleman's request to suspend the provisions, is that GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 40. what you're going to do? Of a rule, ."
"Mr. Speaker, I ask for unanimous consent to advance House Bill 3580 from the order of first reading to second reading, without reference to a committee. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"I object to that, Mr. Speaker."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"Mr. Speaker, having had an objection to my motion, I would now move to suspend Rule 38 for the pur- poses of advancing House Bill 3580 to the order of second reading without reference to a committee."
"Any discussion? All those in favor, vote 'Yeas' and the opposed 'No'. What purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea rise?"
"May I be heard on my motion? I would like to inform the members of why I would like this done."
"Proceed."
"Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, House Bill 3580 is a bill to reapportion the Con- gress of the United States into twenty-four districts with- in the State of Illinois. We have a legislative mandate for this body to reapportion the State into congressional districts. There is a federal law that requires legislative or congressional candidates to run from districts. Unless we fulfill this mandate, this legislative body would or could or might be giving away its prerogative to another branch of government, namely, a federal court. I think that GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 41. it is incumbent upon us, as members of this body duly elected, to carry out the duty that's imposed upon us. If we move this to the order of second reading, the Speaker could call a committee of the whole and we could discuss this and certainly pass a bill out of this House, over to the Senate and have a bill passed by the Senate and signed into by into law by the Governor in time so that a candidates for Congress may know in which districts they are running, and they could do this by the time for the filing in December. I might also ask you to further think that it's not only the congressional candidates that run from these districts, but it will be those members of both parties that are delegates to their National Nomin- ating Convention that will choose the next candidate for the President of the United States from each party, so I think that it's an extremely important measure, and I would ask that the House would a support me in this motion."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Well, Mr. Speaker, I must oppose that the gentleman's motion, it comes as we are in mid-October, filing a bill for congressional reapportionment, I think that. ."
"Just a moment until we get this thing straight, there are no hand cameras allowed on the floor of the House, period! They get 'em from right here."
"The subject of congressional reapportionment is complex, it is something that can not be rushed through GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 42. this House as the gentleman well knows, it involves many many factors that have to be studied in depth. We have a reapportionment committee, composed of some very able people, and I believe this bill should be treated like all other bills and submitted to the reapportionment committee for its consideration and study. The subject is too im- portant for us to be stampeded on on this bill. Then, therefore, I object to the gentleman's motion to advance without reference."
"All right, the gentleman care to close? The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea, you gonna close?"
"Well, Mr. Speaker, in answer to the dis- tinguished Majority Leader's statement that it is too im- portant to do hurriedly, we spent six months, from January through July, and we're not able to accomplish it. I think that it's now incumbent upon the members of this body to get on and do with it. I think I heard it so aptly put this morning. by one of the members of this House, that little by little, the legislative branch of government is being eroded away, and I think this is a step that we, the members of this body, could take to move forward with the bill to reapportion the congressional districts of this State and do it as a legislative act and not surrender that prerogative to any other branch of government. And I would ask for the support of the members of this House."
"The question is shall Rule 38 be sus- pended? All those in favor will vote 'Yeas' and the opposed GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 43. 'No' The gentleman from Union, Mr. Choate."
"Well, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, in the explanation of my vote and support of Representative Shea and his motion, let me say to the members of this House, that I'm of the opinion that certain strengths of this legislative branch of government has been eroded, has been eroded, and certain duties that I've always felt was a part of the legislative branch of govern- ment, has been weakened under the new constitution in which we're operating today. Now, as far as congressional reap- portionment is concerned, yes, I think it is a duty that this legislature should direct its attention to. Now, in recent weeks and days, we have seen and heard much about the courts of this state solving reapportionment as far as Congress is concerned. I think that today is a fine oppor- tunity for us to reassert the legislative prerogative by advancing this bill to second reading, considering it, and if there is amendments, considering the amendments. I think that this is a fine opportunity for us to clearly in- dicate that we were not, when we in the last closing days of the last session, agreeing to any congressional reappor- tionment by the passage of the Republican sponsored State Legislative and Congressional Reapportionment out of this House of Representatives, that we were passing it out only as a vehicle to provide in the waning hours of this session, a vehicle, if you please, to be considered as State Representative and Senatorial Reapportionment. I feel that GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 44. this is an opportunity at least for all of the members on this side and yes, all of the members on that side, to assert themselves and say, we, we, in the legislature, will bring about a solving of the congressional reapportion- ment problem. We're not saying to you by advancing this bill to second reading that we ask you to agree that this is the district that you want, as far as Congress is con- cerned, but we're saying to you that here is an opportunity for this legislature to solve congressional reapportionment. Bring about your amendments from both sides of the aisle on second reading, but today, put it on the order of second reading where this legislature in its wisdom can consider congressional reapportionment. And, Mr. Speaker, I vote 'Yeas'."
"The gentleman from Lake, Mr. Pierce."
"Mr. Speaker, I'm surprised to see that the Chairman of the House Reapportionment Committee is voting against this motion. This should be part of the agreement by which House Bill 2907 was passed last June 28th, when it was agreed both Republican and Democratic reapportionment maps would be passed. Now, our bill that passed at that time only had legislative reapportionment. 2907 had legislative and congressional. No, I think the follow through on that agreement, the Republican Party, the Speaker, the Majority Leader, the Chairman of the Reapportionment Committee should support this bill as a vehicle of congressional reapportionment to fulfill to GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 45. to fulfill the obligation of that gentleman's agreement that both parties maps would be passed. As long as the Republicans passed congressional reapportionment as a vehicle on our support, they should now support our bill as a vehicle and then let the Senate, neither party has a majority in the Senate, let the Senate then a hopefully work out a compromise that all parties can accept. I think it's wrong, it's wrong to have asked us to support your bill as a vehicle and then refuse to support our bill as a vehicle. It's another instance where the so- called gentleman's agreement has been broken, as the Major- ity Leader said this morning, he didn't make any agreement, and now, I'm sure the Chairman of the Reapportionment Com- mittee will say he made no agreement, that we voted for that bill, we Democrats, because we believed in it, and I say you're not telling the truth. We didn't believe in that congressional reapportionment, we passed it as a vehicle and to go into court and say that we supported that and put our names in on that bill is misleading the public, ."
"Hold it, hold it, the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde, for what purpose do you rise?"
"Well, a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Mr., the gentleman addressing us now is again trying to repeat what he tried to do this morning, that matter is before the courts, and I suggest his remarks are out of line."
"The gentleman's point is well taken, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 46. and the gentleman from Lake will confine his remarks to the explanation of his vote with regard to the motion to suspend the Rule 38 concerning House Bill 3580. The gentle- man from Lake, Mr. Pierce?"
"I have a question on legislative inquiry, Mr. Speaker."
"Now, wait a minute, for what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea rise?"
"I rise on a point of personal privilege."
"Not while the gentleman's explaining his vote. I'll recognize you after that. And you have about ten seconds."
"All right, Mr. Speaker, on a legislative inquiry, is this bill part of that gentleman's agreement of last June 28th, that both parties reapportionment bills would be passed over to the Senate in the hope of a last minute agreement and compromise? Do you consider this bill to be part of the gentleman's agreement?"
"I, I, I consider you to be out of your two minutes, sir. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"Mr. Speaker, the only question I have, I've been accused of filing an affidavit that misrepresented the facts and I'm wondering if there's any comment from the Majority Leader that my affidavit is wrong, I'd like to hear it from him instead of behind all of these parlia- mentary dodges."
"That's not an explanation of vote, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 47. and so, we'll move on. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Davis."
"Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I rise to explain my vote and I feel like the little boy when he went to visit his aunt and uncle and they offered him a second helping of ice cream and he refused it. And they said what are you suffering from, a loss of appetite, and he said, 'No, mam, I'm suffering from a loss of politeness.' Well, I want to say to you that we Democrats are suffering from a loss of politeness, because we were certainly polite, and I know we were, because I screamed to the high heavens and the televisions carried me screaming, and the members of my church ask me what I was screaming about, and I had to tell them that there was only, and I don't like to raise any questions, but that map raises it beyond a reasonable doubt. I said to them, I'll tell you what I'm screaming about. There's more than a million black people in Chicago and we have two Congress- men and now one of them is gone bye-bye, that's why. ."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Mr. Speaker. ."
"For what purpose do you rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, it appears to me the distinguished leader from the other side of the aisle is talking about some other bill, some other map than the one that's under question, and it is out of order and no explanation of vote." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 48.
"Your point is well taken, now the remarks are going to have to be confined to the explana- tion of your vote on this motion to suspend regarding House Bill 3580. House Bill 2907 is no longer before this body and so you'll have to confine your remarks to that."
"Mr. Speaker, I'll confine it to it. It was our politeness that created this situation. Nothing but our politeness that created this situation and I'm asking you in the name of decency if you want to help us here and now, you have an opportunity. Let's suspend a rule and get this map before us and lets consider this map, so that we will have one little chance to have equal representation in the court and it'll give us back our congressman."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Katz."
"Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, far be it for me to get up and discuss any bill other than House Bill 3580, I do think, however, that we should be consistent in the position that this legislative body takes. We firmly believe that the right of reapport- ionment is the right that should lodge in the legislature, should not be vested anywhere else, and here we have an opportunity to move a bill forward that will do that which we have always asserted is our basic right, the right of reapportion. Now, I would not want to say that anyone here in this House is taking an inconsistent position, and as- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 49. serting one position on one bill and another position on another bill, as it were a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde kind of approach to problems in the legislature, but I would hope that there would be consistency and that we would assert our right to reapportion and that we would do that which we should do is move this bill on for consideration here on the floor, because really the question of reap- portionment is perhaps the most important matter that we will be considering here in this session."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe."
"Briefly, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentle- men of the House, in explaining my vote, in support of sus- pension of the rule and it's based only on the motion to suspend is in answer to the Majority Leader, Mr. Hyde's statement that objection that the complex, his objection is that the complexity of this bill requires committee con- sideration, and yet the previous legislation which included. both congressional maps, and legislative maps, was intro- duced on May 21, came out of committee on May on June 22, was in the House for four or five days and then was passed without debate from this House. Now, it would seem to me to be consistent, that this bill and the experts have al- ready looked at all the maps and looked at all the pros and cons and the population statistics concerning maps, can follow the constitutional direction for compact contiguous districts, consistent with one man, one vote, and we could GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 50. for the first time, introduce amendments at second reading, look at the bill, debate it, deliberate it, and pass it out, of this House without any reference to a committee. And I would suggest that we get a few more supporting lights to suspend the rules."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Yourell."
"Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen, in urging your support for this particular motion, I think what we have involved here is a matter of ethics, and I know that your side of the aisle, like our side of the aisle, is in- terested in ethics. The ethics that we're talking about is the understanding that men have made between men. We have here what is simply a vehicle to follow and do what we were sent here to do and that is to reapportion the State of Illinois. Now we can not ignore our duties and we must keep some form of ethics and agreement between ourselves. If we betray each other, the question will always arise in the minds of the voters and in the minds of the public, if they can not trust us, to keep our word among each other, who can they trust? Mr. Speaker, we must indeed answer this question. Thank you."
"The gentleman from Christian, Mr. Tip- sword."
"Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm voting for this motion to suspend the rules because I think it's time that we tell the court of this State and of the federal government located in this State, that the GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 51. legislative power and the legislative prerogative in the State of Illinois is going to be exercised by the legis- lature of the State of Illinois. I've become less and less enamored of our courts and especially our courts of last resort. In view of opinions that have been handed down in recent months, especially one that I know is going to plague us very severely and plague the people of the State -of Illinois in regard to personal property tax. And this is but another area of congressional reapportionment that they have taken unto themselves and I think it's high time that we take back unto ourselves as a legislature this power to reapportion, whatever area of government it may be which is ours and reassert the power which belongs to this body, and I urge every member of this House, con- sequently to vote for this motion to suspend the rule."
"Any further discussion or explanation of vote? The Clerk will take the record. On this question, there are 87 'Yeas'and 83 'Nays' and the there are, there are 87 'Nays' and 83 'Yeas' and the motion having failed to receive the required 89 votes to suspend, it is hereby declared lost. For what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea rise?"
THE STATE OPE Gerald W. Shea: "Mr. Speaker, in conformity with Rule 38, I ask that the Speaker of this House now find that there is a demonstrable emergency in reapportioning this congress- ional districts of this State and advance the bill to second reading without reference to a committee." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 52.
"I'm satisfied that the State has been redistricted as far as Congress is concerned, and there is no demonstrable emergency shown, so I will not refer it to second reading without reference on the basis of a demonstrable emergency."
"Thank you."
"You're welcome. Now, we'll go back to Amendatory Vetoes and on the motions on House Bill 1516, on which the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea. Now, we do have the original signed message from the Governor on the Clerk's podium which does show on the $7,300.00 item that it is $7,300.00 and not $7,900.00. there any further question concerning that part? No. All right, the then back to the gentleman from Jackson, Mr. Williams, who was explaining, as I recall, when we went in- to the point of order, a the his motion." Gale Williams: Is "Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I again renew my motion to adopt the Governor's re- commendation on House Bill 1516. I think it's been debated, I think everybody knows what the figures the correct figures are, and I move the adoption of this motion. Roll call."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Simmons."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, I intend to vote for this motion, but I would like to, as long as this is the first one we're working on, I'd like to try to get something clear in my mind. Assume if you will, that I had decided to do something different than Gale is trying to do, and GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 53. had introduced an amendment that was not satisfactory, and it was voted down and then he comes along with this one and did meet the number of votes necessary in the House to pass. I'm asking now, whether or not these a types of amendments should be numbered and number two, does only the sponsor have the right to offer an amendment such as this?"
"Well, these questions that you are raising at this time are hypothetical in nature. The matter is not before us for consideration. The gentleman has a motion on which is clear and that is he wants us to adopt an amendment. There is actually no amendment as such on the bill right now, because once the bill was en- rolled and engrossed and sent down to the Governor, it was a bill and the amendment aren't, any amendments that were on it through the legislative process, are no longer in- volved with it. I suggest that we address ourselves to this one, and as we move along, why we may or may not get to those possible problems that you raise. What purpose the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea rise?"
"I am wondering if the sponsor of this piece of legislation would yield to a question with regards to Section 2 that he is requesting to be added to the act."
"The gentleman indicates that he'll yield."
"Representative Williams, as I read this, it gives certain areas of minimum wage which a teacher may be paid in the State of Illinois for certain jobs and for cer- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tain decrees degrees from universitites. There are step increases, and let us take the one in where a person has a Master's Degree and 150 hours, the minimum will go from $5,600.00 to $6,800.00 under this piece of legislation, as I read it. Is that correct?"
"Yes, that's correct."
"All right, and then we have Section 2, the one which I have question about with regard to the Exec- utive Order of the President of the United States freezing wages and the last part of it, 'together with any modifi- cation or extension thereof, by or pursuant to federal law' Now, what will happen if the President by Executive Order says that no person shall receive more than a ten per cent wage increase in any year and therefore would limit, and instead of the $5,600.00 figure would be about $6,160.00- and our bill would say $6,800.00. Would we by the second paragraph then be giving away our legislative prerogative to set these minimum wages now to the federal executive, and if so, I'm just thoroughly opposed to it, and I think that we could better frame this part saying that we will comply or we will ask the Governor to comply with the effective date of this law, but I just don't want to give away anymore legislative prerogatives and particularly to the federal government."
"Well, I think it's quite clear, Represent- ative Shea, that the Federal Wage and Price Freeze Act will prevail until the wage freeze goes off. I don't think GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES there's any question about that, and I don't think we could pass a bill that would change that one ioţa. I think the freeze will be for a short time and I think we're all in agreement there, and I think that the bill is a good bill and as the Governor has in his recommendation."
"Well, Gale, I have no question that I think it's a good piece of legislation, I supported it originally My my real question is what are we doing with Section 2? Now, if you rather than this precise language, I ask if you might not want to look at it and draft some other language, saying that we will comply with the wage freeze order of the Executive Branch, but to extend it to any other modifications or extensions of federal law, I think that what we're doing is now making a piece of legislation enacted by this body approved by the Governor, subject to other federal regulations, and I don't think this is what we want to do."
"All we're doing, as I read this, when we a- gree to this motion, we're simply saying that we're going to comply with the federal wage and price freeze control until it's off. I don't think you could change it in any way in the world."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Kipley."
"Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, perhaps I can add a little explanation to what is bothering Representative Shea. In view of the fact that we, in private industry, have had a similar problem GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 56. with the wage freeze act as it went into effect on August 15. Now, my interpretation of this Section 2 would be the same thing as it was interpreted in our industry, that in in the event of a promotion or in the case of or in this case in the event of a higher degree, you would be entitled to an increase in salary regardless. The increases that they're talking about under the wage freeze are merely merit increases or across the board increases. They have nothing to do with promotions, or in this case, the ac- quisition of a higher degree, and I think that this part 2 is well in accord with the wage wage wage freeze act."
"The gentleman from Christian, Mr. Tipsword."
"Would the sponsor of this motion yield to one question, please?"
"He indicates he will."
"Representative Williams, I believe, am I am I quoting you correctly, and at least this is my under+ standing of it, that without Section 2 of this amended a- mendment being incorporated, the federal law is going to apply anyway, is it not? I wanted to know then why even incorporated at all and run the risk of broadening our ap- plication of federal law beyond merely the application of the freeze orders, or the orders made pursuant thereto, and and establish this unfortunate precedent of writing into our law federal enactments that we don't even know about yet?" GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 57.
"Well, I still go back to my same answer, I I think we're simply saying that we are going to comply. I think we would have to comply with whether that was in there or not, as far as that's concerned. We just simply saying we're going to comply with it, that's all we're doing."
"Mr. Speaker, if I might address myself to this just a moment. I have no quarrel particularly with the motion in regard to the the first portion of the amendment that is proposed here. I would like to have seen the figures stay as they were, but I would not have any serious objections to the Governor's amendatory lan- guage, and I believe that I would support it, except, that I do not feel that I can can vote for this kind of an in- sertion that we find in the Section 2 of the amendatory language, because I think we are thereby again abandoning the legislative power of the General Assembly of the State of Illinois, or we may be doing so. The effect of what- ever this national emergency legislation may be is going to affect the payment of wages pursuant to this law, no doubt, and I think it will affect it in the way that it should affect it, legally, without us incorporating Section 2. I think Section 2 is a very dangerous precident for us to set, because it is a specific a specific abandonment of the legislative role and the legislative power by this House of Representatives, and because of that, unfortunate- ly, I can't support the what is truly meant by the Governor, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 58. I think, in his amendatory veto message to this House, which I probably would otherwise vote for."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe."
"Thank you, Mr. Speaker, will the gentle- man yield to a question?"
"He indicates he wi 11."
"Ah, Representative Williams, in your original bill you have an effective date of July 1. In the original bill, July 1 of 1971 on which these standards, these are only standards of minimum wage levels, we're not talking about any increases, really, we're giving guide- lines to the school districts with respect to the employ- ment of professional personnel in each of these categories. Now, isn't it up to the employing body or the district to determine, one, whether the increase went into effect prior to August 15, and if it did not, to suspend it under the wage price freeze and not to plug it with a mandatory Section 2, relating to federal legislation which is incon- sistent with your bill, and with the thrust of the standards that are being set forth here."
"Well, as you know, Representative, we passed a lot of bills in the last session, that the effective date should have been July the 1st should the Governor have signed them in time to take effect then. No bill takes effect until he signs it into law, and of course, it would it would take effect immediately in that case. This bill GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 59. will take effect immediately if we adopt this motion, subject to the wage price freeze regulation put on by the federal government. I think that's very obvious."
"Well, that, in answer to that, that's not my point. This does not relate the to the effective date of the bill, it relates to the effective date of the standard to be applied, which the effective date in your bill is July 1, 1971. No matter when this law passes, so that would have to, in my opinion, be corrected if you're going to insert Section 2, then you would have to amend the bill and remove the effective date of these standards to a date later than August the 15th. Now the two are not consistent as where I see. No necessity for Section 2 in the face of the changes recommended by the Governor, with respect to the standards."
"Is there any further discussion? The gentleman care to close? The question is shall shall the House adopt the amendment to House Bill 1516? All those in favor will vote 'Yeas' and the opposed 'No' and this takes 89 votes to carry. Have all voted who wished? The Clerk will take the record. The gentleman from Champaign, Mr. Clabaugh."
"Mr. Speaker, I've seen a lot of stuff thrown around since I've been a member of the legislature, and excuses made, but I've never heard as flimsy a one as has been made here on this bill. Now, you know the Gov- ernor of Texas wasn't going to pay any attention to the GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 60. price and wage freeze, and he went down and he was going to raise the school teachers all down in Texas, and de- spite the law, but he went back, he went down to Washington to talk to some cooler heads and he went back and he said, 'Well, I will comply'. Now whether this Section 2 was in this bill or not wouldn't have made a bit of difference, the federal law would have taken, would have superseded the anything that we could have written in here now. Now, we've been operating for ten fifteen years on step changes in school a teachers salaries, the minimum salaries in every branch. Now, I didn't favor this bill, I was against it when it was in, I thought it was too much even after Representative Williams had amended it. I called some people who had been opposed to it at the noon hour today and they said now that they thought that the bill was all right, they weren't very crazy about it, and frankly, I'm not very crazy about it, but I see an opportunity, maybe that the Republican Party might just make a little hay on this thing and that the other side says, 'Well we can't do that, so we won't vote for it', and I would suggest that if they don't vote for that, to just let it go, I'd let it go down and then just let the people know, the teachers of the state know, that the great party of the people would rather pay politics than to do a constructive piece of statesmanship."
"The gentleman from Jackson, Mr. Williams." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 61.
"Mr. Speaker, before the roll call's announced, I do want to poll the absentees."
"For what purpose does the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Genoa Washington rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I wish to vote 'Yeas' on the amendment to 1516."
"Record the gentleman as 'Yeas'. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Kipley."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, how am I recorded?"
"How is the gentleman recorded?"
"The gentleman is recorded as not voting."
"I vote 'Yeas'."
"Record the gentleman as 'Yeas'. What the gentleman from Cook, Mr. Choate?"
"Not from Cook!"
"Union!"
"Not yet."
"The gentleman from Union."
"Mr. Speaker, and certainly taking into con- sideration the snide remarks of the gentleman from Champaign, and certainly taking into consideration the source from which they came, and certainly taking into consideration the fact that he doesn't know whether anyone is sincere in opposition to this particular wording that he's talking about, because I haven't seen him over here talking to any- body to find out whether they were or were not, far behoove it from me from denying the teachers of this State at least GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 62. a minimum increase in their salaries. I still don't like that one portion that Representative Shea and Represent- ative Tipsword was talking about, and I still don't think that it needs to be a part of this legislation. I still think the legislation would be effective as far as the teachers of this State are concerned, and I still think that as the gentleman from Champaign himself said, whether it was in the bill or whether it was not, the wage and price freeze would be effective and that is the very thing that we were talking about, the way I listened to the de- bate, that if it was not a part of the legislation, it would still be effective as far as the President's order is concerned. Therefore, I can see no reason for it being a part of the legislation and that's exactly the thing that Representative Tipsword and Representative Shea are talking about. Change me from present to 'Yeas'."
"Choate 'Yeas'. Berman, 'Yeas'. All right, I'm gonna dump that roll call. All those in favor of vote 'Yeas'. Have all voted who wished? The Clerk will take the record. All right, there are 145 'Yeas' and no 'Nays'. This amendment having received the constitution- al majority, is hereby declared adopted and passed. For what purpose does the gentleman from Christian, Mr. Tips- word rise?"
"Mr. Speaker, I wish to request that I be voted as present on that bill, please."
"Tipsword, present. Shea, present. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 63. All right, on the motions under Amendatory Vetoes, appears a motion with regard to House Bill 438 on which the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe."
"Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, consistent with my remarks of this morning, Mr. Speaker, with reference first to before I go into this House Bill 438, I'd like to strike from the cal- endar under Vetoes, Total Vetoes, House Bill 437 and House Bill 457, which the Governor vetoed and I agree with his veto, because these matters are taken up in other bills, one of them which we're going to talk about in a few minutes, so may I have leave to strike from the calendar those two bills?"
"No."
"No? Thank you."
"Well, the reason for this is that, the other 176 members in this chamber have the prerogative, if they wish, prior to 12:00 midnight next Wednesday, to move to over-ride that veto. So, I, you can not by yourself, a take that right away from them."
"I stand corrected, Mr. Speaker."
"Okay. Well, do you want to proceed with the 438?"
"Yes, please. Will the Clerk read the motion, please?"
"The Clerk will read the motion."
"Pursuant to paragraph (e) of Section 9 GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 64. of Article IV, the Constitution of 1970, I move that the House accept the specific recommendation for changes to House Bill 438 as set forth in the Governor's message of August 17, 1971, and that the Clerk inform the Senate there- of and request that the Senate concur herein. B. B. Wolfe."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. R. Wolfe."
"Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. House Bill 438 is one of a series of 82 bills which I filed to correct certain statutes con- sistent with the new constitution and the judicial article. The Governor made recommendations concerning House Bill 438 which only amount to language changes and technical corrections, which I hope the House will adopt as I ah, favor the Governor's treatment of House Bill 438 and his specific recommendations with respect to the amendment filed with the motion, and I now move that we adopt or consider favorably the Governor's action."
"Is there any further discussion? Gentleman care to close?"
"No, I'd like a vote, Mr. Speaker."
"All right. The question is, shall the House adopt the amendment to House Bill 438. All those in favor will vote 'Yeas' and the opposed 'No'. Have all voted who wished? The Clerk will take your record. On this, there're 137 'Yeas' and no 'Nays', and the amendment is adopted. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 65.
"A point of parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Speaker."
"Yes."
"Does your ruling with respect with to the total vetoes and the right of every member of the House to a take up the question of over-riding the veto also apply to the other categories of vetoes, like the reduction veto, the line veto, and the amendatory veto?"
"When somebody raises a specific question concerning a bill on one of those categories, I will rule on that. You raised a question with regard to specific bills you ask be stricken and I ruled on that."
"Well, you made it general ruling, though, Mr. Speaker,. . ."
"I made a specific ruling with regard to those two bills, that you ask be stricken."
"Thank you."
"All right, on the calendar, under motions under Amendatory Vetoes, appears House Bill 1875, on which the Chair recognizes the gentleman from McHenry, Mr. Lindberg."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, I would move a the adoption of the motion pursuant to Paragraph (e) of Section 9 of Article IV of the Constitution. The House accept the specific recommendation for change as to House Bill 1875 as set forth in the Governor's message of September 2, 1971."
"Is there further discussion? The GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES gentleman from Cook, Mr. Barnes.".
"Mr. Speaker, would the sponsor yield to a question?"
"He indicates he will."
"Would you kindly explain what it does, please?"
"I'd be glad to. If you'll just give me give me a moment to check the,. I want the bill, ah, essentially, ah, this bill 1875 is an amendment to the "Court Reporter's Act'. Ah, it expands the ability of the court reporter to receive expenses for traveling within the county of residence in connection with their official duties, and also increases the compensation which they may receive as a maximum of $11,500.00 to $13,000.00, and the amendatory veto invokes the executive order of the Pres- ident."
"The gentleman from Champaign, Mr. Clabaugh."
"I'd like to ask the sponsor a question, please. George. ."
"He indicates he'll yield."
"Does this presume that if the, well, let's just take Cook County for instance, if the court reporter lived out at Barrington, would he be allowed, well, I guess I don't know if that's in Cook, I guess part of it is in Cook, would he be allowed expenses every day to go from his home to the court house and back?" GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 67.
"In answer to that question, Represent- ative Clabaugh, the language says that subject to regulations that may be adopted by the Supreme Court, court reporters shall be allowed travel expenses when traveling within their county of residence, in connection with their official duty Now the discussion of the judicial advisory council which recommended this legislation, that particular matter was discussed and it is obviously the intent of the legislation not to pay for ordinary commuting expenses associated with going to and from the job, but if they were required to go to any part of the county in connection with their duties, they would be compensated. Now, this again is going to be backed up by Supreme Court Rules and I think we have to impose a certain amount of confidence in the fact that they will protect against an abuse such as the one you are sug- gesting."
"When I realize how lenient those people are with themselves in a lot of things, I wouldn't trust them in this particular thing, and I would hope that your body Advisory Body would see to it that a fellow can't move the farthest point in the county and then get expenses both ways every day."
"The gentleman from Christian, Mr. Tip- sword."
"Would the gentleman sponsoring the motion yield to one question, please?"
"He indicates he will." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 68.
"Representative Lindberg, since this amendment relates solely and only again the to the engraft- ing onto our law of the federal wage freeze language, and what may happen pursuant to that law hereafter, or other federal law in that area, I want to ask you what would happen if if we failed to adopt this amendment, what would happen to this bill then?"
"Ah, Representative Tipsword, I think that that would be more appropriately addressed to the Speaker. It calls for parliamentary procedure determination, I don't think I'm qualified to make that. ."
"Then, Mr. Speaker, I'd like to make a parliamentary inquiry. In case this amendment, this amendatory language that the Governor has sent to us were not adopted by this House, what would be the result, and. what would then happen to this bill procedurily?"
"If that happens, then I'll rule at that time."
"I think, that it's important for us to know. We're not interested in killing a bill, we're in- terested only some of us in this particular amendatory. language. We have supported the bill in the past, but it gives some pause constitutionally, we'd like to know what happens to this bill if that would occur."
"Well, the the reason for my ruling is there are a variety of things that could happen. For ex- ample, the sponsor of the motion could ask for postponed GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 69. consideration and things could be worked, I mean there are a whole variety of things, and then I'm not going to stand up here and and rule on those things, when the specific issue is not before me. Gentleman care to close? All right, the question is, ah, shall the House adopt the amendment to House Bill 1875. All those in favor will vote 'Yeas' and the opposed 'No'. Have all voted who wished? The gentleman from McHenry, Mr. Lindberg."
"Well, just in order to give everybody a enough time to get on the a board, I might take this opportunity to explain my vote. The basic provision of this bill is to escalate court reporters' salaries to a maximum of $13,000.00, instead of the former maximum of $11,500.00. You'll remember we had another bill in here to increase it to $16,000.00, but basically the essence of this bill was passed by both Houses and sent to the Gover- nor. Now it comes back for the imposition of this Exec- utive Order of language which is characteristic of so many of the bills that we're considering here now. So certainly if you're reluctant to vote on the basic concept, I just point out that you already passed it last Spring. I would encourage the support of all members."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea."
"Well, Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I'd like to be recorded as present. It would be my interpretation or thought and I would hope the Speaker would go or rule this way, that if this bill did not re- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS MOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ceive 89 votes, it then would be returned to the Governor, so that he could act on it, and I think that he would then have the opportunity to veto or sign it and certainly any action he took would be subject to the President's raise, Presidental wage freeze, so therefore, when this bill be- comes law, I think that any raise these people are entitled to, could not happen until such time as the Presidental raise freeze was lifted."
"Have all voted who wished? The gentle- man from Cook, Mr. Maragos."
"Mr. Speaker, and I presume and therefore it's an inquiry as well as explaining my vote, I presume that the other bill that was had a higher stip into the court reporters was vetoed by the Governor, if Represent- ative Lindberg could give us the. . . was the bill vetoed by the Governor, was the other bill vetoed by the Governor outright?"
"The gentleman from McHenry, Mr. Lindberg."
"Ah, I don't see, I think Representative Blades was a sponsor of the other bill on the $16,000.00, is that correct?"
"All right, now, wait a minute. The gentleman from Wayne, Mr. Blades, care to respond?"
"Yes, I sponsored on the bill, but I didn't get it passed. It didn't pass."
"It passed the House, did it not?" GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 71.
"No, hun-uh."
"I thought it had."
"No."
"That's all."
"No, Shea hung me out on it, I couldn't get it."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Shea, care to respond?"
"I didn't understand what Representative Blades ask me."
"Said, 'you hung him out on it'."
"Well, if he said I did it, I must've done it."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Maragos, through?"
"Yes, I just vote 'Yeas'."
"All right, uh, have all voted who wish? The Clerk will take the record. The gentleman from McHenry, Mr. Lindberg."
"Ah, Mr. Speaker, I think that again, there is some misinformation on this bill. We passed this basic concept last session that we established that the maximum that court reporters could be paid would be $13,500.00 under this bill. Apparently, the bill calling for $16,000.00 as the maximum which is the federal rate, was rejected by the House or the Senate or both, so that is, ah, I think a modest proposal for court reporters. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 72. There is a shortage of court reporters, and I think this will encourage more people to come into the field, so I certainly hope that some of those people who are familiar with the plight of the court reporter with would give us the extra four or five votes that we need."
"Calvo, 'Yeas'. How is the gentleman from Cook, Mr. B. B. Wolfe recorded?"
"The gentleman is recorded as voting 'Yeas'."
"Kennedy, 'Yeas'. Houlihan, 'Yeas'. Hill, 'Yeas'. Corbett, 'Yeas'. Brummet, 'Yeas'. Flinn, 'Yeas'. Stedelin, 'Yeas'. Stone, 'Yeas'. Boyle, 'Yeas'. On this question, there are 95 'Yeas', 5 'Nays', and the House adopts the amendment. Clerk put one present. On the order of Amendatory Vetoes, under Motion, appears House Bill 1628, on which the Chair recognizes the gentle- man from DuPage, Mr. Hoffman. The Clerk will read the motion."/
"Motion. Pursuant to Section 9, (e) of Article IV of the Constitution of 1970, I move that the House accepts the specific recommendation for changes to House Bill 1628 as set forth in the Governor's message of August 4, 1971, that the Clerk inform the Senate thereof and request that the Senate concur herein. Gene L. Hoff- man."
"Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I move that the House concur in the amendment to GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 73. House Bill 1628. During the a process of negotiating on this Bill in the Senate, I agreed and the co-sponsor of the bill agreed to an amendment which established 1968 equalize assessed evaluation of property which was required in the western project, vis a vis, the wording that the bill came out of according to Section 18-4. In the process of the last days of the session in the Senate, we had thought this amendment was adopted, it was not adopted. This was in line with what we agreed to do in the Senate, and we concur in this amendment and I would ask your con- currence."
"Is there discussion? Question is, shall the House adopt the amendment? All those in favor will vote 'Yeas', the opposed 'No'. Have all voted who wished? The Clerk will take the record. Shapiro, 'Yeas'. Nowlan, 'Yeas'. Carroll, 'Yeas'. Richard. Carter, 'Yeas'. Lauterbach, 'Yeas'. Freedman, 'Yeas'. Choate, 'Yeas'. Regner, 'Yeas'. Meyer, 'No'. 133 'Yeas', 1 'No', and the amendment having received the constitutional majority is hereby declared adopted. All right, leave of the House, we'll go to messages from the Senate."
"Message from the Senate by Mr. Wright, Secretary. Mr. Speaker, I am directed to inform the House of Representatives that pursuant to the recommendations of the Governor, the Senate has adopted amendatory provisions to a bill of the following title in the adoption of which I am instructed to ask the concurrence of the House. Senate GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 74. Bill Number 1096, a bill for an act to amend Section 2 of the 'Personnel Code'. Action taken by the Senate, October 13, 1971, Kenneth Wright, Secretary."
"Leave of the House to go to intro- duction and first reading of House Bills."
"House Bill 3585, Madigan. A bill for an act to amend 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3586, Katz. An act in relation to payment for state services, fees or taxes. First read- ing of the bill. House Bill 3587, Alsup. Amends 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3588, Terzich, et.al. Bill for an act to amend 'The Illinois Insurance Code'. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3589, Borchers. Amends the 'The Environmental Protection Act'. First reading of the bill. 3590, Harber Hall. Amends 'School Code'. First reading of the bill. 3591, Harber Hall. Amends 'The Illinois Vehicle Code'. First reading of the bill. 3592, Harber Hall. Amends 'The Vital Records Act'. First reading of the bill. 3593, McDevitt. Amends the 'Insurance Code', article, compen- sation of auto accident victims. First reading of the bill. 3594, Houde. Amends 'Charitable Trust Act'. First reading of the bill. 3595, Day. Amends the wage deductions for the benefit of creditors act. First reading of the bill. 3596, Day, et.al. Amends 'Probate Act'. First reading of the bill. 3597, Day, et.al. Amends 'The Illinois Vehicle Code'. First reading of the bill. 3598, GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 75. Day, et.al. An act making an appropriation to the Logan Printing Company. First reading of the bill. 3599, Hall, okay, just sit them down there, Hall, et.al. Amends 'The Highway Code'. First reading of the bill. 3600, Fary. Amends 'The Bingo Act'. First reading of the bill. 3601, Matijevich, et.al. Amends 'The Election Code'. First reading of the bill. 3602, Hirschfeld. Amends an act codifying the powers and duties of the Department of Mental Health. First reading of the bill. 3603, Hirschfeld. Amends 'The Highway Code'. First reading of the bill. 3604, Philip. Amends 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill. 3605, Philip. Amends 'The Public Aid'. First reading of the bill. 3606, Philip. An act to add Section 2.1, et.al., an act establishing the judicial districts. First reading of the bill. House Bill 3607, Caldwell. Amends 'The Limitations Act'. First reading of the bill. 3608, Douglas. Establishes 'The Illinois State Lottery Law'. First reading of the bill. 3609, Douglas, et.al. Amends 'State Finance Act'. First reading of the bill. 3610, Douglas. Permit an act con- cerning experimental use of animals by secondary school students and science club members. First reading of the bill. Senate Bill, House Bill 3611, Simms. Amends 'The Revenue Act of 1939'. First reading of the bill."
"Ah, resolutions. Agreed resolutions list."
"House Resolution 401, Philip, et.al. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 76. House Resolution 402, Fary, et.al. House Resolution 403, McDevitt, et.al. House Resolution 404, Ropa, et.al. House Resolution 405, Conolly, et.al. House Resolution 406, Craig. House Joint Resolution 92, Shapiro, et.al."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Mr. Speaker, these are the agreed resolutions House Resolution 401 and this is a very important resolu- tion. It memorializes the U.S. Postal Service to issue a stamp honoring the 100th anniversary of the invention of the automatic screw machine. Anybody that wants to co- sponsor that could come down and give their names to the Clerk. House Resolution. .automation is moving along. House Resolution 402 will the Clerk, will the Clerk read House Resolution 402, please?"
"House Resolution 402, Fary, et.al., Whereas, on September 12, 1971; the Honorable Louis Janczak better known to his colleagues and many friends as "Uncle Louie", celebrated his 75th birthday; and, Whereas, "Uncle Louie" was honored by a surprise birthday celebration at which were present his four children, ten grandchildren, twelve great grandchildren, relatives, friends, political cronies, legislators, judges, and members of Congress, great tubfuls of Polish sausage and sauerkraut being rapidly devoured by this mighty host who danced the night away to the happy strains of live, 'red hot' Polka music; and, Whereas, these frivolities occurred across the road from a cemetery wherein 'The Grim Reaper' darkly attired GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 77. and sitting on a tombstone, tested the blade of his nine foot sickle with a bony thumb and swore, 'this defiance will only make sweeter the hour of my inevitable triumph', and similar evil tidings toward the unwary celebrants; and, Whereas, Uncle Louie is a man of marvelous reserve and is not given, as are some of his colleagues, to vain rhetoric, pompous monologues, and bombastic harangues on the floor of this House, and has been erstwhile aroused to deplore a social condition he found personally abhorrent, namely ladies wrestling, for, after witnessing a ladies wrestling match announced, 'there was nothing more disgusting', pro- ceeded to expunge this evil by introducing a bill, to for- ever ban lady wrestling in this State, and the bill which received immediate national acclaim drew the wrath of a certain professional lady who sent Uncle Louie a letter challenging him to a wrestling match and enclosed with her letter a picture of herself in a tank with the alligator she occasionally wrestled, the alligator appearing to the better advantage; and, Whereas, Uncle Louie having shown this letter to his seat mate, the Honorable Bill Murphy of the fabled legislative team of Fary, Murphy and Janczak, Murphy unbeknown to Uncle Louie, went to Western Union and sent this lady a telegram to wit: that Uncle Louie accept- ed her challenge, that he never met the lady he couldn't out-wrestle and that she had only to name the time and place; Whereafter Murphy's treachery was discovered, Uncle Louie being fearful of his life, formed a training committee GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of 'Red' Hillstrom, Gabe Ditore, John Cusack, Bill Perkins and the late Bill Noorlag, all esteemed members of the 'Third House', the training committee headed by the Honor- able John G. Fary, in a courageous attempt to get Uncle Louie 'in shape' for the great contest, trained vigorously every evening at the St. Nicholas Hotel, however, the only portions of Uncle Louie's anatomy showing noticeable im- provement were his elbows, but providentially the bill died in committee and the match was called off; and, Whereas, Uncle Louie has been a member of this body for fifteen years, and attained fame and publicity as a life long mem- ber of the legislative team of Fary, Murphy and Janczak, and this dynamic triumvirate will be memorialized in the hearts of the people of Illinois for their unrelenting efforts and ultimate success in legalizing bingo in this State; and, Whereas, the Honorable John G. Fary and the Honorable Bill Murphy wish well the third member of this colorful legislative team, Uncle Louie, and hope that he will continue on this earth as long, long time but es- pecially another 29 years, so that the team of Fary, Murphy and Janczak may meet to toast in the New Year 2000, A.D.; Therefore, Be It Resolved, By The House of Representatives of the Seventy-Seventh General Assembly of the State of Illinois, That this body warmly congratulates its esteemed colleague the Honorable Louis Janczak on the recent cele- bration of his 75th birthday; that we most heartily extend our sincere best wishes for a long life and good health; GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 79. and that a suitable copy of this Preamble and Resolution be forwarded to the Honorable Louis Janczak."
"I really don't know what to say about this Fary, he puts these things in all over, he's got the thing all backwards. Johnny, you did a lousy job."
"House Resolution 403 congratulates Eugene and Jennie Rogers on their 92nd and 90th birthdays. House Resolution 404 congratulates Honorable Vito Marzullo on being chosen by the Marshall Square Chicago Boys' Club as the Man of the Year. House Resolution 405, wishes Happy Anniversary to Edith and Horace Gardner upon their 40th year of marriage. I've been asked to read House Resolution 406, ah, and . . . Whereas, Time and tide wait for no man, as our aging, ancient, bearded colleague, Charles M. 'Chuck' Campbell has become aware; and, Whereas, the distinguished 'hippie' from Vermilion County now faces the unpleasant task of accepting Old Age Assistance; and, Whereas, Repres- entative-Campbell's creaking body and bones can no longer function with his calm, brilliant legislative mind; and, Whereas, the traumatic experience of passing from middle age to old age would demoralize a lesser man; and, Whereas, one cannot help but wonder what would be the shape of this aching body if it were not for Representative Campbell's total abstinence and strong will and constitution against the evils of 'wine, women, and song!'; and, Whereas, it is where it is right and proper to honor a man when his age cycle reaches a round figure, and, by the way, Represent- GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ative Campbell has one; and, Whereas, Representative Campbell, on October 11, 1971, did reach the golden age of fifty years; Therefore, Be It Resolved, by the House of Representatives of the Seventy-Seventh General Assembly, that we, including his counterpart in the 49th Represent- ative District, Representative Robert Craig, do hereby wish Representative Campbell the happiest of birthdays on this his 50th birthday and hope that he has many more healthy and happy birthdays. House Joint Resolution 92 designates the Mount Morris' Let Freedom Ring bell-ringer as the official bell-ringer of the State of Illinois. I move the adoption of the agreed resolutions."
"All those in favor of the adoption of the agreed resolutions say 'Yeas', the opposed 'No'. The 'Yeas' have it, and the agreed resolutions are adopted. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"Mr. Speaker, I wish to announce that tomorrow will be the last day for introduction of house bills. I now move that this House do stand adjourned."
"The gentleman from Cook, Mr., no. The gentleman from Cook, Mr. Hyde."
"All right, I now move that this House do now stand adjourned until 10:00 A.M. tomorrow morning."
"All those in favor of the adjournment resolution, motion say 'Yeas', the opposed 'No', the 'Yeas' have it, and we'll be adjourned until 10:00 A.M. tomorrow morning." GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Adjourn at 3:55 O'Clock P.M. 10/13/71 skn. GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 81.