Illinois House Floor Debate — May 12, 2004

“The hour of 12:00… 12:45 having arrived, the House will be in order. Will the Members please be in their seats? Members and guests are asked to refrain from starting their laptops, turn off all cell phones and pagers and rise for the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance. We’ll be led in prayer today by Reverend Bill Clark with the Church of the Nazarene in Marseilles, Illinois. Reverend Clark is the guest of Representative Gordon.” 09300126.doc 2  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “And we’ll be led today in the pledge by Representative Brauer.” Brauer – et al: “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” 09300126.doc 3  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “Roll Call for Attendance. Representative Currie for excused absences.”

“Thank you, Speaker. Please let the record reflect that Representative Hoffman is excused today.”

“And Representative Bost.”

“The record will show… the record will reflect that absence. Representative Verschoore, for what reason do you rise?”

“Personal privilege. I’d like to make everyone in the chamber aware, tomorrow the Medal of Honor ceremonies for… that’s gonna take place at 11 a.m. at the Firefighters’ Memorial. So, I just wanna make everybody aware of that. Thank you very much.”

“Thank you. And Mr. Clerk, take the record. There are 116 Members answering the Roll Call, a quorum is present. Representative Franks, for what reason do you rise?”

“I rise on a point of personal privilege.”

“State your point.”

“I’d like to introduce, in the north gallery, the Alden-Hebron High School junior and senior class who came down today to Springfield, 12 students and their teacher and chaperone. Welcome to Springfield.”

“Okay. So, resuming on the Order of Senate Bills-Third Reading, where we left off yesterday, on page 12 of the Calendar, the Senate Bill 3166. Representative 09300126.doc 4  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Delgado. We’re picking up where we left off yesterday on Senate Bills-Third Reading. So, Mr. Clerk, read the Bill.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Delgado.”

“Thank… thank you, Mr. Chair… thank you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House. Senate Bill 3166 is an initiative of the Department of Human Services. It’s intended to make clear when a report is due to the court regarding the status of persons committed under the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act. It also is intended to provide further protections for victims when a offender’s status has changed. Basically, this… 36… 3166 does three things. Under the current law, the… what it will do will make sure that the Department of Human Service will be required to submit an evaluation of all persons committed under the Act to the court within six months of the initial commitment order and also within six months and every 12 month thereafter. Second, there’s no time requirement for when reports must be prepared and third, under the current law, victim notification of an offender’s change in status is only required upon conditional release or discharge. This Bill would incorporate other scenarios in which it’s essential that a victim is notified. And I would ask for your ‘aye’ vote.” 09300126.doc 5  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Delgado has moved for passage of Senate Bill 3166. And on that question, the Gentleman from DuPage, Representative Meyer is recognized.”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

“’Reasonable attempt to notify’ would be working directly through and actually, let me get some more information for you on that, Representative, ‘cause I’m not gonna take a stab at that other than the reasonable motions would be that a requirement in (a) in working with the victim in sending notification out, sending notification also, getting… and staying in touch with the cust… the custodian being the Department of Corrections. But the primary reason would be to notify the victim and send a notice to the victim that this has occurred.”

“So, ‘reasonable’ would have to be in writing and within a time frame of when that person is released.”

“Absolutely, Representative, and I can assure you… I’ve worked with you on many Bills on criminal law. I’m the chair of Human Services and I work very close with a wonderful crack staff they have with the legislative director who used to be on staff with us, Amy Brennan with Director Adams. And as you know, I have a great passion for violence prevention. I work very close with the Attorney General’s Office on this type of legislation. This one being an initiative of the Human Services that we will make sure that their reasonable efforts are maximum standards and not minimum.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Delgado… Delgado to close, please.”

“Thank you. As we continue to address the areas of… of sexual offenders and violence, it is very clear that this is a very… a strong move in makin’ sure that we update where we need to go. The Department of Human Services should be commended for bringin’ this initiative forward and I’m very proud to carry it. And I would ask for your ‘aye’ vote.” 09300126.doc 7  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 3166 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Representative Poe, would you like to be recorded? Very good. Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Representative Boland, for what reason do you rise?”

“A point of personal privilege…”

“Yes.”

“…Mr. Speaker. Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, if I can have your attention for a moment. We have the birthday of a… one of our most famous Members. You’ll always recognize him by his green ties and green face and other… other green parts. And that is… today is the birthday of Representative Jack McGuire of Joliet. Let’s all give him a good hand. He’s only 39 years old today. Well, plus a few days.”

Speaker Hannig: “Happy birthday, Representative. And Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 3174?”

“Representative Lang.”

“Thank you. This is a Bill that is the… that came from the Department of Human Services. A simple Bill that had no opposition either in the Senate or in committee. Currently, the disclosure of mental health records can be 09300126.doc 8  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 authorized during the course and reevaluation mandated by the Abuse of Adults With Disabilities Act and that applies to nursing home settings. This would add language to include persons in residential settings as well. I would ask for your support.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 3174. Is there any discussion? There being none, the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 115… 6… Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 115 voting ‘yes’, 0 voting ‘no’ and 0 voting ‘present’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read House… Senate Bill 3184? Representative Fritchey, you’re up.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Fritchey.”

“Thank you… thank you, Speaker and Members of the Body. Senate Bill 3184 really clarifies some language with respect to allowing senior citizens who are participants or who are approved for benefits under the Circuit Breaker Act to receive a discounted registration fee of $24 for their standard license plates as well as the Purple Heart and Korean War Veteran plates. It’s a commonsense piece of legislation, it really is. It expands circuit breaker 09300126.doc 9  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 benefits to a number of our seniors who have all of our senior benefits… senior veterans to whom we owe so much. I’d be happy to answer any questions. Otherwise, I’d ask an ‘aye’ vote. Thank you.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 3184. Is there any discussion? There being none, the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 3208.”

“Representative Turner. Representative Turner on Senate Bill 3208. Out of the record. The Gentleman from Lake, Representative Sullivan, for what reason do you rise?”

“State your point.”

“The Lady from Lake, Representative Ryg.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. Not only is Carmel High School an award-winning football team, but they also have a lot of experience and a lot of accomplishments in several other areas. These kids on the team, so far in their high school experience, have contributed approximately 10 thousand hours of community service. Thirty-three of the players were on the honor roll at the semester, four Illinois State Scholars and over 39 players with grade points of 3.0 or plus. The motto of Carmel High School is ‘the values are for life’ and we think this group especially exemplifies that motto. And we’re glad to welcome them to Springfield and offer our congratulations. Thank you.”

“The Chair will now go to page 13 of the Calendar, Senate Bills-Second Reading. We will try to go to those Bills where the Amendments have been sent to the floor or where the Bills are prepared to go to Third Reading. The Chair will try to omit those Bills where there’s an Amendment pending and we’re aware of it. So, the first Bill on that Order of Second Reading is Senate 09300126.doc 11  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Bill 827. Representative Grunloh. Would you like us to move that Bill? Senate Bill 827. Representative Grunloh.”

“Mr. Speaker, I believes there’s an Amendment that has to be filed for that, yet.”

“Right. So, we can adop… we can…”

“Yes.”

“Okay. Mr. Clerk, would you read the Bill.”

“Okay. Representative Grunloh, is it your intention to move the Bill to Third at this time or do you want us to hold the Bill for an Amendment? Do you have an Amendment pending?”

“Is it… If the Amendment’s been filed, I would like to go to Third Reading.”

“Okay. Then I… I would… we’d have to hold it then, I think.”

“Okay. So, Mr. Clerk, let’s hold that on the Order of Second Reading. Senate Bill 948, Representative Turner’s Bill. Mr… Representative Turner, would you like us to move Senate Bill 948? Mr. Clerk, read the Bill.”

Speaker Hannig: “Third Reading. Senate Bill 984, Representative Capparelli. Mr. Clerk, would you read that Bill?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 1006?”

“Okay. Excuse me, Mr. Clerk. Let’s take that out of the record at the request of the House Sponsor. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 1553?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 1604?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 1684?” 09300126.doc 13  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 1691?”

Speaker Hannig: “Representative McGuire on the Amendment. Representative McGuire on Floor Amendment #1 to Senate Bill 1691.”

“Hold on a second, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, excuse me. Would you take this out of the record for the moment? Thank you.”

“Okay. That Bill is out of the record for the moment. Okay. So, let’s move to Senate Bill 1906.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2148?”

“Representative Nekritz.” 09300126.doc 14  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. The underlying legislation of Senate Bill 2148 is to restrict cigarette sales to minors over the Internet. This particular Amendment allows an individual to transport cigarettes to another resident of the state. Originally, we limited that to one carton; we’re now changing that to five cartons. And I’d ask for your support.”

“Is there any discussion? All in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. Is there any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2165?”

“Okay.”

“Mr. Clerk.”

“Mr. Clerk, let’s take that Bill out of the record. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2236.”

“Okay. Let’s hold that at the Order of Second Reading. So, out of the record. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2252?” 09300126.doc 15  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Representative Saviano, would you like us to move this to Third? Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2254 for Representative Saviano?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, could you read Senate Bill 2367 for Representative Coulson from Second to Third?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2375 for Representative Osterman?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2377 for Representative Coulson.”

“Representative Coulson.”

“Is there any discussion? All in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Are there any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2395?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2401?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2424?”

Speaker Hannig: “The Lady from Cook, Representative Feigenholtz.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is a cleanup Amendment that was requested by the Department of Public Health to reconfigure the members of the task force so that they correspond with members on the breast and cervical cancer committee.”

“Is there any discussion? All in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2432.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2447?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2499?”

“Okay. Mr. Clerk, let’s hold that on the Order of Second Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2517?”

“Mr… Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill… Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2547.”

“Okay. Mr. Clerk, let’s take that out of the record. Okay. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2525?”

“Have… have all the notes been filed? Mr. Clerk, did you indicate… Okay. So, Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2548. Excuse me. Mr. Eddy, for what reason do you rise?”

“Yeah, state your point.”

“Welcome to Springfield. Mr. Clerk, have you read… would you read Senate Bill 2548?”

“Representative Aguilar.”

“Is there any discussion? All in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Are there any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2559?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2578?”

“Okay. Mr. Clerk… Mr. Clerk, let’s take that out of the record. Mr. Clerk, could you read Senate Bill 2607?” 09300126.doc 20  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Third Reading. Okay. Excuse me. Mr. Clerk, let’s… let’s return that to the Order of… Okay. So, Mr. Clerk, let’s hold that on the Order of Second Reading. So, return Senate Bill 2607 to Second Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2617 for Representative Saviano?”

“Third Reading. Okay. Mr. Clerk, let’s return Senate Bill 2617 to the Order of Second Reading at the request of the Sponsor. Mr. Clerk, let’s read Senate Bill 2635 for Representative McCarthy.”

Speaker Hannig: “Okay. Let’s… let’s take that out of the record at the request of the Sponsor. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2653 for Representative Turner? Representative…”

“Third Reading. And Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2665 for Representative Howard.”

“Let’s… let’s take that out of the record for the moment. Mr. Clerk, let’s read Senate Bill 2724 for Representative Slone.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 26… excuse me. 2768. Yeah. Let’s… let’s hold 2768. We’re waiting for an Amendment. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2844.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2878 for Representative Turner?”

“Third Reading. And Mr. Clerk, could you read Senate Bill 2880? Okay. Out of the record, Mr. Clerk. 09300126.doc 22  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 And let’s look at Se… Senate Bill 2887 for Representative Saviano.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2926 for Representative Davis?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2944? Representative Sommer.”

“Okay. Out of… Mr. Clerk, out of the record. Let’s look at Senate Bill 3007 for Representative Howard. Is the Lady in the chamber? 3007. Okay. Let’s take that out of the record. Senate Bill 3013 for Representative Ryg. Mr. Clerk, would you read the Bill?”

“The Lady from Lake, Representative Ryg.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Amendment #2 is simply a technical Amendment. In the drafting of the Bill, we 09300126.doc 23  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 overlooked at the amending of the Township Code. By adding this Amendment, we’ve addressed all water suppliers in the State of Illinois. The underlying Bill is regarding notification requirements.”

“Is there any discussion? All in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 3021. Representative Joe Lyons.”

“Third Reading. And Representative Joyce on Senate Bill 3069. Okay. Out of the… out of the record, Mr. Clerk. And let’s look at Representative Moffitt. Are you prepared… prepared on Senate Bill 3189? Okay. Mr. Clerk, read the Bill.”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 3207 for Representative McKeon?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, what is the status of House Bill 5385? That’s on page 10 of the Calendar.”

“Okay. Return that to the Order of Second Reading at the request of the Sponsor. And Mr. Clerk, what is the status of Senate Bill 2499?”

“So, let’s… let’s hold that on the Order of Second Reading. And Mr. Clerk, what is the status of Senate Bill 984?”

“Okay. Let’s… let’s return that to the Order of Second Reading at the request of the Sponsor. Okay. We will now go to the Order of Senate Bills-Third Reading and begin on page 11 of the Calendar and then just go down the Calendar. So, we’ll start with Senate Bill 2106. Representative Dugan. Mr. Clerk, read the Bill.”

“Representative Dugan.”

“Thank you, Speaker. Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, Senate Bill 2106 authorizes the director of National (sic- 09300126.doc 25  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Natural) Resources to convey to the Village of Aroma Park three separate land parcels for a dollar. This agreement… there was a intergovernmental agreement between DNR and the Village of Aroma Park back in 2002 when the DNR was instructed to purchase the land and enter into an agreement with Aroma Park with the intent that Aroma Park would always in the end govern that property. So, this is just to kind of finalize the agreement that was made back in 2002. And so, I’m… I would ask… answer any questions and would like a ‘yes’ vote.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2106. And on that question, the Gentleman from Vermilion, Representative Black.”

“She indicates she’ll yield.”

“The appraisal, Representative, back in 2002 when then Governor George Ryan instructed, there was an appraisal done at that time when DNR purchased the property.”

“And there… and there is… there is no appraisal that needs to be filed with the clerk as state land is being transferred to another unit of government.”

“Correct. They’re… they’re transferring it over to be used for public recreational purposes. The Village of Aroma Park, for the last couple of years, has invested money into that property due to the intergovernmental agreement that was reached between them and DNR and so, they have upgraded the land. There is a reversal clause in the agreement that if it turns out that is doesn’t stay as public property, it reverts back to DNR.”

“Yes. In consid… There is language in there in consideration of… for the one dollar.”

“I believe that there was one done back in 2002. I would assume before DNR purchased the land to begin with, Representative.”

“Five hundred thousand.”

“No. I believe what we’re doing is… is living up to the agreement that was made by the state back in 2002 when they wanted this property used as public recreational purposes and the Village of Aroma Park said that they would govern 09300126.doc 27  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 that property and fix the property up since DNR was not able to do that themselves.”

“I’m sorry, Representative, I didn’t understand the question.”

“According to the mayor of the Village of Aroma Park, I understand that has already been discussed. They’ve already invested over $50 thousand into the property and have the funds available in order to help maintain it and to upgrade it.”

“I agree with you that the taxpayer’s money for land for tax… for the land, but it is given back to the taxpayers by givin’ it to the local unit of government to use for public recreation.” 09300126.doc 28  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“It may have been, but that wasn’t done. All I’m trying to do now is to just finalize the intergovernmental agreement that was made with Aroma Park in 2002.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Then Representative Dugan to close.”

“Yeah. I just want to again just clarify as far as the Village of Aroma Park. They have already invested $50 thousand into this property and as the analysis shows, the Village of Aroma Park intends to continue to upgrade that property and will invest at least the $500 thousand into that particular piece of property. And also, after talking to DNR, this is done on a regular, you know, on a basis. This is not the first time this has been asked to be done. The property was purchased through the OSLAD program and this is done this way. And so I would ask for… for the people to live up to the agreement made in 2002 and ask for a ‘yes’ vote.”

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2106 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 69 voting ‘yes’ and 47 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Representative Slone, for what reason do you rise?”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, I would like you to please give a warm, Springfield welcome to the Central Illinois Centers for Independent Living. They’re up in the gallery wearing blue T-shirts just like this one. Please welcome them to Springfield.” 09300126.doc 30  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “Welcome to Springfield. Representative McCarthy, for what reason do you rise?”

“I rise on a point of personal privilege, please.”

“Yes, state your point.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d also like to welcome the young people from St. Bede the Venerable Catholic School on the south side of Chicago who are visiting with us today. So, please give ‘em a warm, Springfield welcome.”

Speaker Hannig: “Welcome to Springfield. Representative Acevedo, are you prepared on Senate Bill 2122? Okay. Out of the record. Representative May on Senate Bill 2140. Mr. Clerk, would you read the Bill.”

“The Lady from Lake, Representative May.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. Senate Bill 2140 amends the Property Tax Code. It allows the township assessors in Lake County to return their assessment books on October 15, 30 days earlier than they’ve done it in the past. This is good for consumers. It allows taxpayers more time to appeal if they wish. It passed unanimously out of the Senate and out of the House committee. There is no known opposition.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2140. And on that question, the Gentleman from Cook, Representative Parke.”

“She indicates she’ll yield.”

“It’s… it’s in the statute now, the dates.”

“I believe so, yes.”

“They have traditionally done it on November 15. I… I, you know, I don’t know all the history.”

“It’s the township assessors.”

“I believe so, yes. In fact, one assessor from Lake County, your colleague and Representative, is supportive of this Bill.”

“Yes.”

“Yes, yes, yes. He’s standing right behind you, Sir.”

“There is an assessor, yes. A township assessor.”

“And no… behind you.”

“Smiling, waving.”

“Okay. No, I don’t think they consider this a problem.”

“Thank you.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Lake, Representative Sullivan.”

“Any further discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 115 voting ‘yes’ and 1 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2122.”

“Representative Acevedo.” 09300126.doc 33  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. Senate Bill 2122 amends the Insurance Code 5 and provides that an application for vehicle registration and an application for renewal of vehicle registration must include the policy number and expiration date of the policy liability insurance coverage for the vehicle. I’ll be happy to answer any questions.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2122. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2145.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Adams, Representative Tenhouse.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of 2145. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 115 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2158.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Lake, Representative Mathias.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2158. And on that question, the Gentleman from McHenry, Representative Franks.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Will the Sponsor yield?”

“Indicates he’ll yield.”

“Representative, is there any increase here in the tax rate or will there be more taxes… taxes levied or will there be any holds put in a tax cap on this Bill?”

“Okay. I just wanted to make that perfectly clear.”

“Thank you.” 09300126.doc 36  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Is there any further discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2166?”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Colvin.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Good afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. I have for your presentation and your approval Senate Bill 2166 which would amend the district’s Act to remove special revisions for sale of property along the north branch of the Chicago River between Belmont and Lawrence Avenues. This is a very specific piece of legislation dealing with the repeal of part of the Water Reclamation District’s Act that will simply not allow them to transfer real property for sale in Cook County. This is… in specific in relation to a strip of land along the north branch of the Chicago River at which point the Water Reclamation District came to Springfield in ’94 and asked for permission and received it through legislation to transfer that piece of real property 09300126.doc 37  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 reflecting the change in the strategy of the Water Reclamation District. They no longer are interested in selling or transferring any of that real property and they simply wanna repeal that section of the law that would allow them to do so. I’ll be happy to answer any questions.”

“And on that question, the Gentleman from Cook, Representative Fritchey.”

“Thank you, Speaker. Will the Sponsor yield? Yes.”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

“Representative, do you know where the land in question is located?”

“Yes, I do. It is on… along the north branch of the Chicago River between Belmont and Lawrence Avenues.”

“Do you know whose district that happens to be in?”

“I suggest… I would believe it’s probably yours, in reference to the questions you’re asking.”

“You’re correct. Do you know the history of this issue?”

“Some of it.”

“To the Bill, Speaker.”

“To the Bill.”

“Ladies and Gentlemen, it’s with great caution that we should tread to carry legislation that affects another Representative’s district. The issue here involves a series in a number of homeowners located specifically in my district. These are homeowners that have had docks and other riverside improvements, that have put a lot of money 09300126.doc 38  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 into these riverside improvements over the years with the knowledge and tacit acquiescence of the Water Reclamation District. They have tried in good faith; they’ve worked with the city; they’ve worked with their local aldermen; they’ve worked with their community groups to do whatever it is they could do to simply enjoy the rights that they’ve had on their property for years. They have taken advantage of the ability to live on the river in the city. They have docks. They have recreation. They have worked in good faith to maintain all of this. I think the world of this Sponsor. I get along well with the commissioners of the MWRD. This legislation is being sought to give them a legal out so they would no longer have to negotiate with my homeowners in my district to preserve their homes and their property rights. If it’ll… district thinks that they have a legal way to get out of this, let them fight this battle in court. Let them negotiate. They are coming to us to solve a situation which they cannot fight on the local district. They didn’t come to me to carry this Bill. They never discussed this Bill with me. I happened to sit in the Executive Committee when this Bill came up. You may not care about this Bill and you probably shouldn’t and won’t care about this Bill ‘cause it does not affect any of your districts other than mine. But I’m gonna ask you to be very cautious here, because one day and I… and I… and I sincerely do not fault Representative Colvin for doing this. I really don’t. But Ladies and Gentlemen, please think about what you’re doing because one day a Legislator 09300126.doc 39  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 may carry a Bill that affects nobody else other than your district and they’re gonna try to put that Bill through because nobody else is gonna care about it. But you’re gonna care about it and your constituents are gonna care about it and you’re not gonna appreciate the way that this… that’s something’s being done to your constituents. This Bill may… may fly out, I don’t know. I can just try to listen… to speak and have you listen to a little bit of reason here. Please look at the big picture here. I gotta piece of legislation coming through, targeted at my district, they tried to circumvent me. This may happen to you one day. I’m gonna ask you to stand with me here, I’ll stand with you at that time. Thank you.”

“Any further discussion? The Lady from Cook, Representative Mulligan.”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

“Point taken.”

“Is there any further discussion? Then the Gentleman from Cook, Representative Colvin to close.”

“To the… to the issue that this previous speaker brought up. I would like Representative Fritchey to know that and I think, of course, he does know that we’ve always had a great relationship and we’re able to work together and not knowing this was specifically within your district when the Water Reclamation District brought this Bill to me and pointed out there’s a problem, I thought that they had joined the right… all of the right… yes, they had docks there, they had made improvements there. They had every right except the right of ownership. And I think the change that they make here is not specific just to this one area because it reflects how they would be able to transfer real estate in… within the entire Water Rec… Water Reclamation District. I know, in the argument in the Senate that this did not come up. I didn’t know if it was an issue in which it was a point of contention or not. I think what the Water Reclamation District is trying to do 09300126.doc 41  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 is, their point of contention here is it reflects their strategy with… it relates to real estate transfer and not wantin’ to transfer real property in the district. And I don’t know what the impact or if and there would be any impact because I know a number of instances in Cook County in which people use Water Reclamation District and have gotten along with them very well. And in light of that, I would simply urge an ‘aye’ vote.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2166. All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Representative Franks and Krause, would you like to be recorded? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 35 voting ‘yes’ and 66 voting ‘no’. And the Bill fails. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2196?”

“Representative Nekritz.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, Senate Bill 2196 is legislation that has passed through the House several times before, most recently several weeks ago in the form of House Bill 5884. This is also legislation dealing with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. This gives them the right to be the sole stormwater management authority for Cook County. And I’d ask for your favorable support.” 09300126.doc 42  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2196. And on that question, the Lady from Kane, Representative Lindner.”

“Okay. The record will so… so reflect. The Gentleman from DuPage, Representative Meyer.”

“Sponsor will yield.”

“Yes… yes, Representative. Currently, the stormwater management authority in… for the county of Cook is under the purview of the Cook County Board, but they have not seen to engage in any stormwater management activity. So, we are attempting to make the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, who has expertise in this area, into the stormwater management authority for the entire county.”

“Yes, it is.”

“We elected to move forward with this piece of legislation in the House.”

“There is a… there is a tax cap exception in this. When the… when the stormwater management authority legislation was initially enacted in 1991, I believe it was, the surrounding counties: Lake, Ken… Lake, DuPage, Kane were given taxing authority to start up a stormwater management authority. Cook County was not because Cook County is Home Rule and therefore didn’t need the taxing authority. If we are to establish the MWRD as the taxing author… as the… as the stormwater management authority, they need to have taxing authority in order to provide that new service.”

“It did under the pre… it did under the legislation that we passed earlier this year and it does this time, yes.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Nekritz to close.” 09300126.doc 44  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Ladies and Gentlemen of the House, this is a new service to be provided in Cook County. It is a much needed service. Stormwater does not ref… respect municipal boundaries and I have the Des Plaines River running right through the center of my district and I know the impact that flooding can have, not only on homes and businesses, but also on the ability for people to get from point A to point B. This is an important new service. And I would ask for your support.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2196. All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk… Representative Fritchey and Black, would you like to be recorded? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 61 voting ‘yes’ and 54 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2201?”

“Representative Delgado, for what reason do you rise?”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the chamber. I gotta personal privilege. I just wanted to recognize a wonderful group here from Heartland Human Care Services of Central… the Center for Education and Culture, one of ‘em 09300126.doc 45  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 in our district on Fullerton Avenue with their administrator Abdullah Vasquez and some wonderful folks from the Humboldt Park, Belmont-Cragin community. Let’s give ‘em a nice, General Assembly welcome.”

“Welcome to Springfield. And Representative Colvin on Senate Bill 2201.”

“Tha…”

“The Gentleman from Cook.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Senate Bill 2201 would establish the laboratory advis… a laboratory advisory committee whose task is to oversee all state, county, and federal and private forensic laboratories in the State of Illinois in order to bring more unity and structure to the handling of scientific evidence. This Bill is a labor of two and a half years of negotiation with Illinois State Police forensic laboratories across the state, state prosecutors and public defenders. We’ve negotiated to the point where we gotta, I believe, a committee where we had nothing in it before, in place of it before, that would deal with the evaluation of how the state handles forensic evidence that would make specific recommendations and advisements to forensic facilities in terms of improving their quality of service in dealing with the huge backlog of forensic evidence that’s currently in the State of Illinois. I’d answer any questions.”

“The Gentleman’s moved for passage of Senate Bill 2201. And on that question, the Gentleman from Cook, Representative Fritchey.” 09300126.doc 46  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Thank you, Speaker. Will the Sponsor yield?”

“Yes.”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

“Representative, does this have anything to do with my district?”

“No, not at all, unless…”

“I think it’s a great Bill then. Thank you.”

“The Lady from Kane, Representative Lindner.”

“To the Bill.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Colvin to close.”

“Simply urge an ‘aye’ vote. Thank you.”

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2201 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk… Representative Granberg, would you like to be recorded? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a 09300126.doc 47  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2272.”

“The Gentleman from Vermilion, Representative Black.”

“The Gentleman’s moved for passage of Senate Bill 2272. And on that question, the Lady from Peoria, Representative Slone.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Black… Will the Sponsor yield, sorry?”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

“Mr. Black, can you tell me whether this legislation would permit the construction of trails for off-highway vehicles in state parks?”

“What is… what does the current law permit with respect to these type of trail construction in… on state property?”

“I beg your pardon?”

“It doesn’t say. All right. According to the analysis that we have, it says that the Department of Natural Resources is disallowed from using money from the off- highway vehicle trails fund to construct motorized recreational trails on department-owned or managed land.”

“Okay. Could we… would it be possible to get a definitive answer as to which of these is correct?”

“Do you know whether the funding for that trail came from the off-highway vehicle trails fund?”

“Because this, again…”

“And if I understand correctly, under current law, those funds can’t be used to put motorized recreational trails on department-owned or managed land.”

“Thank you, Mr. Black. To the Bill. Ladies and Gentlemen, there is plenty of other land where off-highway vehicle trails can be constructed. I would urge a ‘no’ vote for the construction of vehicle… off-highway vehicle trails in our Department of Natural Resources lands. Illinois has a very… relatively small number of such lands in terms of acreage compared to other states. And I think, to the greatest extent possible that land should be reserved for the peaceful enjoyment of… of our state parks and not for off-highway vehicle use.”

“Is there any further…”

“I would urge a ‘no’ vote.”

“Any further discussion? The Gentleman from DuPage, Representative Meyer.”

“He indicates he’ll yield.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Black to close.” 09300126.doc 51  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2272 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 91 voting ‘yes’, 22 voting ‘no’ and 2 voting ‘present’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2290.”

“Representative Lyons.” Lyons, J.: “Speaker, I believe that we were gonna table an Amendment on this. I don’t what the status of the… that procedure is.” 09300126.doc 54  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Okay. I’m advised your Motion to Table is in the Rules Committee. So, we’ll come back to that after the Rules Committee meets. Okay?” Lyons, J.: “Thank you, Mr. Speaker.”

“So, that’ll be out of the record at this time. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2337?”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Clinton, Representative Granberg.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. House Bill… Senate Bill 2337 creates a penalty of a Class IV felony for anyone who… for anyone who would substantially disrupt or impair a communications provider’s ability to provide that to their customer base. It’s model legislation that’s been adopted in other states in anticipation or to deal with potential terrorist threat. It passed the Senate unanimously and came out of the House Judiciary Committee unanimously, as well. I’d be happy to answer any questions.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2337. And on that question, the Gentleman from Vermilion, Representative Black.”

“Indicates he’ll yield.”

“Mr. Black, you raise a very, very good point and you are absolutely correct. This is no way intended to harm that one individual who might take that course of action. As you indicated, this is for massive disruption of service. There is no intention whatsoever to affect one customer.”

“Is there any further discussion? The Lady from Cook, Representative Monique Davis.” Davis, M.: “Will the Sponsor yield?”

“Indicates he’ll yield.” Davis, M.: “Thank you. Representative Granberg, I heard Black respond, but I would like to hear from you. Have we had any cases like he was speaking of? Have there been cases that you’re trying to find the remedy for?”

“Representative, this is preemptive. So, you’re taking this… this strategy with this legislation to hopefully avoid something like that occurring. So, they’re doing it in advance of that happening. So, this is not in re…” 09300126.doc 57  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Davis, M.: “So, at this point, you don’t have anyone who has attempted to disrupt an entire cable system?”

“Not that I’m aware of in this state.” Davis, M.: “Do you think somebody might try to do that?”

“I mean, that’s the… and that’s why they’re trying to take this action now so in hopes that this will not happen or at least we will have this option available to us in case someone attempts to do that, to disrupt that service.” Davis, M.: “So, if… if your service is completely off or some major disruption occurs, is that for Direct TV, as well as cable?”

“Just cable.” Davis, M.: “What about Direct T.V.?”

“Well, you’re here looking at massive disruption not just one home or two homes, or something of that nature.” Davis, M.: “Something that would disrupt a lot.”

“It’s substan… It’s substantial.” Davis, M.: “What about Direct TV? Suppose you’re a Direct TV owner.”

“If this only… it affects the cable.” Davis, M.: “This only affects cable.”

“Yes.” Davis, M.: “Okay. Thank you, Representative.”

“Thank you.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Granberg to close.” 09300126.doc 58  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. I wanna thank my good friend, Representative Black, for explaining the Bill. Just move for its passage.”

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2337 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2360?”

“Representative Froehlich.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2360. And on that question, the Gentleman from Crawford, Representative Eddy.”

“Indicates he’ll yield.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Froehlich to close.”

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2360 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 110 voting ‘yes’, 0 voting ‘no’ and 6 voting ‘present’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2362?”

“The Lady from Kankakee, Representative Dugan.”

“Thank you, Speaker. Senate Bill 2362 amends the School Code to provide that in the state aid formula provisions calculation of available local resources shall exclude the tax and the state funds received as a result of the Public 09300126.doc 61  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Act 93-26. I’ll answer any questions or I would ask for a ‘yes’ vote.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2362. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Representative Granberg. Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2370?”

“Representative Reitz.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Senate Bill 2370 is a clarification of House Bill 46, last year. Just some cleanup language to clarify the definition of ‘gasohol’ and the definition of ‘majority blend ethanol fuel’. And I’d be happy to answer any questions.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2370. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a 09300126.doc 62  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, could you read Senate Bill 2374?”

“Okay. Let’s take this out of the record for the moment. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2386?”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Lake, Representative Mathias.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2386. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 114 voting ‘yes’ and 2 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a 09300126.doc 63  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2448.”

“Representative Bellock.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2448. And on that question, the Lady from Cook, Representative Flowers.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Will the Lady yield?”

“The Lady will yield.” Flowers: I’m sorry, Representative, what does this Bill do again, please?”

“Okay. So, the investigator for DCFS inform the parents as to what they’re being investigated for.”

“Okay. Now, they know their rights that they’ve been accused of, they’ve been informed. Will they have a day in court? I mean, what’s the point in them being informed of their rights and what they’ve been accused of if they’re not going to have their say in court?”

“How will the family contest what they’re being accused of?”

“Thank you.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Bellock to close. Oh, excuse me. Representative Black was asking for recognition.”

“The Gentleman from Vermilion.” 09300126.doc 65  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“My apologies, Representative Black.”

“She indicates she will.”

Speaker Hannig: “Is there any further discussion? Representative Bellock to close.”

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2448 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 116 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a 09300126.doc 67  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2495?”

Speaker Hannig: The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Osterman.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the House. Senate Bill 2495 is an initiative of the Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence. It deals with orders of protection. It helps bring Illinois into compliance with the Violence Against Women Act and requires that orders of protection will state that the order is enforceable in all 50 states. Also, requires that the order of protection must state that violating the order subject to federal charges and punishment pursuant to the Violence Against Women Act and adds language that the subject of the order of protection may be in violation of federal gun control penalties if he is caught transporting firearms across state lines. Again, this is an initiative that’s come out of a task force to try to have uniform language in orders of protection. There are no opponents to this legislation. I ask for your support.”

“The Gentleman has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2495. Is there any discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Representative Feigenholtz. Mr. Clerk, take the record. 09300126.doc 68  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 On this question, there are 115 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, read Senate Bill 2654.”

“The Lady from Kane, Representative Lindner.”

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2654. Is there any discussion? The Lady from Cook, Representative Monique Davis.” Davis, M.: “Representative, there must be a problem with my computer because your Bill didn’t pop up. So, would you explain what it does?”

“Is there any further discussion? Then the question is, ‘Shall this Bill pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who 09300126.doc 69  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 115 voting ‘yes’ and 0 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2732?”

“Okay. Mr. Clerk, let’s take that out of the record. Would… Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate Bill 2988?”

“The Lady from Cook, Representative Lou Jones.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House. Senate Bill 2988, let me get my notes here, creates the resident… Residential Tenants’ Rights Repair Act. The Bill simply states that if a tenant… if a tenants’ residency has a… has… there’s something that’s in the residency that has to be repaired and they have notified the owner and within 14 days it has not been done, then that tenant’s with a valid repair notice can submit that to the owner and then they can deduct that from the rent. It can only be done… it cannot be done in public housing, condominiums, not-for- profit residential property, nonresidential tenancies. They… and they have to wait the 14 days to give the owner time to make the repair.” 09300126.doc 70  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“The Lady has moved for passage of Senate Bill 2988. And on that question, the Lady from Champaign, Representative Jakobsson.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I just have a question about the computers. The current Bills are not popping up. Can somebody check that out, please?”

“Yeah. I’m advised that you can type in the Bill number manually and you can still get the… you can still get the Bill and the analysis. Is that correct? That’s not correct. Representative Jakobsson.”

“That’s correct, but sometimes the vote is being taken by the time we get it run.”

“Why don’t we just stand at ease then for just a few moments while we try to get the LIS system back up and running? So, while we’re at ease with the LIS, we have two Resolutions that we could go to. So, Mr. Clerk, let’s look at House Resolution 906. Okay. So, Representative Mendoza, would you like to say a few words on behalf of House Resolution 906 and then we’ll adopt it?”

“Sure. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. House Resolution 906 is very important to me in the sense that it honors the death of a person that was very close to me and to a lot of students in the State of Illinois, specifically in the town of Bolingbrook, Village of Bolingbrook. Jim Paskiewicz was my soccer coach, a very, very important person in my life and I know had a direct impact on the lives of not tens or hundreds but thousands of children and young adults, now young professionals, over the course of his lifetime. He 09300126.doc 71  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 served almost 20 years as a teacher with the Valley View School District and made his way up the ranks and ended his career at Bolingbrook as the assistant athletic director. Coaching, not just soccer, but Little League on his off time, but in the high school specifically was the varsity men’s and women’s soccer coach. Mr. P., as we lovingly referred to him, was just a great guy. Anyone in this chamber who would have had the pleasure of knowing him would, I’m sure, agree and I really can’t even begin to tell ya the impact that this man had on my life. When I think about being a public servant and what it means, I think of a person like Mr. P. who always had time to share with everyone, who gave of himself, who gave of his heart, his love to everyone without ever asking for anything in return. As a student athlete, for me, Mr. P. instilled what it was to have respect for my team, respect for myself, for my teammates and respect for just the program in general. Always making us dress up on game days, always making us comport ourselves as professionals on and off the field. He was a neighbor to myself, was a neighbor to many, a friend to many, a loving father, grandfather for too short of a time and most importantly I just think a huge inspiration for me as an elected official today to hopefully be able to someday walk in public service shoes the way Mr. P. did without ever getting the credit that I think he so aptly deserved. But part of this Resolution which I’m teaming up with Representative Hassert and also Representative Meyer, if we could add their names to the 09300126.doc 72  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 board I’d really appreciate it. We are urging the Valley View School District which is now turning the current Bolingbrook High School where I went to school and I graduated, where he coached for so many years, that school is going to be converted to a middle school and there’s a brand new, beautiful, state of the art, high school that is being built that will be open in August, I believe. And we’re looking to and urging the Valley View School District Board as well as Mayor Roger Claar to name the new soccer athletic complex, the football-soccer athletic complex on behalf of Mr. Paskiewicz. So, I would hopefully be able to count on everyone’s support on that. It would mean a lot to me. I’m sure his family and all of the students who have been impacted, student athletes as well, by Mr. P. Thank you.”

“The Lady has moved for the adoption of House Resolution 906. And on that question, the Gentleman from DuPage, Representative Meyer.”

“Representative Mendoza moves for the adoption of House Resolution 906. All in favor say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Resolution is adopted. Yeah. Mr. Clerk, let’s do House Resolution 908.”

“Representative Mathias. I’m sorry, Mof… I’m sorry, Representative Moffitt.”

“The Gentleman has moved for the adoption of House Resolution 908. Is there any discussion? Then all those in favor of the Resolution say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. 09300126.doc 75  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Resolution is adopted. Mr. Clerk, what is the status on page 14 of Senate Bill 1906?”

“Okay. Return that to the Order of Second Reading at the request of the Sponsor. And Mr. Clerk, would you read House Bill 5417? That’s on the Supplemental Calendar #1.”

“Representative Franks.”

“Thank you. The Amendment becomes the Bill and we passed it unanimously in committee and this was in conjunction working with Representative Rose. We talked about this Bill and it strengthens the DUI penalties for those driving under the influence with minors under the age of 16. I’d be glad to answer any questions.”

“The Gentleman has moved for the adoption of Floor Amendment #1. Is there any discussion? Then all in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Are there any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Mr. Clerk, would you read Senate… on page 14 of the Calendar, Senate Bill 2165.” 09300126.doc 76  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Representative Bradley.” Bradley, J.: “Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This Amendment is the result of discussions and suggestions from the Judiciary Committee and the subcommittee on Public Safety that was part of the Judiciary Committee. What the Amendment does is it places a restriction on the affirmative defense. This is the affirmative defense Bill. It places a restriction on the home property and a business. So, that’s what the substance of the Amendment is. It’s in conformity with other state statutes in terms of the language. And I would ask for adoption of the Amendment.”

“The Gentleman has moved for the adoption of Floor Amendment #1. Is there any discussion? Then all in favor of the Amendment say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the Amendment is adopted. Any further Amendments?”

“Third Reading. Representative Dunkin, for what reason do you rise?”

“A point of personal privilege, Mr. Speaker.”

“Yes. State your point, Representative.”

“Yes. As the Members of the Body, I would like to, if they could help me recognize members from the Pui Tak 09300126.doc 77  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Center in my district in Chinatown, over here on the left here. Standing here to the left, from Chinatown, Pui Tak Center. (Representative Dunkin welcomes them in Chinese).”

“Welcome to Springfield. And Representative Black, for what reason do you rise?”

“Yes. What’s…”

“Representative Leitch, for what reason do you rise?”

“The Lady from Cook, Representative Monique Davis, for what reason do you rise?” Davis, M.: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman… Mr. Speaker. I am speaking on behalf of Elementary-Secondary Education Chairperson to advise the Members of Elementary-Secondary Education that our meeting at 3 p.m. will require votes. It will not be subject matter and we will again be voting on Bills and if we complete those Bills today, we won’t have to meet tomorrow. Thank you.”

“Representative Art Turner, for what reason do you rise?”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker and Ladies and Gentlemen of the Assembly. I’m speaking on behalf of the energy association and the energy industry, an association here locally that is honoring one of our colleagues tonight. And I may be 09300126.doc 79  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 speaking out of turn, but I wanted to invite all of the Members to come for a reception that’s being held tonight at Maldaner’s for one of the Members of that committee and our colleague here, Representative Charles Morrow. This is a… an event that they wanted to host for Charles Morrow tonight recognizing his 18 years of service here in the Assembly and I’d like to extend an invitation to all the Members to come by Maldaner’s tonight between the hours of 6:00 and 8:00 and tell Chuck Morrow what you really think of him.”

“Representative Lang for a Motion.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move to suspend the posting requirements on the following Resolutions so they can be heard in committee today and tomorrow. I’ll read the list as fast as I can, there’s a lot of numbers. House Resolution 79, 387, 411, 412, 413, 418, 534, 578, 581, 595, 628, 649, 656, 670, 674, 680, 681, 701, 704, 721, 739, 763, 775, 826, 830, 838, 845, 863. House Joint Resolutions 23, 54, 60, 70, 73 and 79. I so move, Mr. Speaker.”

“So, the Gentleman has moved to suspend the posting requirements on the… the Resolutions that he read. They’re on this list for the Members who would like to have a written copy. They’re on the yellow list that was passed out. So, is there any discussion on the Gentleman’s Motion? Representative Boland.”

“No, Mr. Speaker. This was… I’d like to also suspend the posting requirements on House Resolution 79 which will 09300126.doc 80  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 be assigned to our committee today, Elections & Campaign Reform Committee.”

Speaker Hannig: “Representative, that’s not part of Representative Lang’s Motion, so let’s not discuss that at the moment. Representative Black, for what reason do your rise?”

“State your point.”

“I asked the Gentleman not to make…”

“…that a part. So, we’re…”

“And that’s all.”

“All in favor of the Gentleman’s Motion to waive the posting requirements say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the posting requirements are waived. So… Representative Boland, if… I think if you look at page 1…”

“Oh, okay.”

“…on the list, you’ll see that House Resolution 79 is on the list.”

“Oh, okay. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.”

“So… so, you’re included. And… and I hope that the Members would also recognize, if you’d look at the 09300126.doc 81  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 yellow list, the good news here, that Friday has been canceled. But I would advise the Members that we’re still planning on being back here on Monday, so… Representative Churchill, for what reason do you rise?”

“State your point.”

“Welcome to Springfield. Representative Parke, for what reason do you rise?”

Speaker Hannig: “No, I don’t… It’s a very serious and legitimate question, Representative. I don’t know the answer today, but I hope that tomorrow we will be able to clarify that that kind of question.”

“So, I’m advised that the LIS system is back up and running. So, we were doing Senate Bill 2988. We’ve 09300126.doc 82  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 read the Bill. Why don’t we just begin by giving Representative Jones a chance to briefly, again, discuss the Bill and then we’ll pick up from there.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Senate Bill 2988 creates the Residential Tenants’ Right to Repair Act. It simply says that when a tenant has a repair in the home, the apartment or whatever and they give the owner 14 days to make the repair and with valid information and a valid receipt they are allowed to deduct the money… if the repair has not been done within the 14 days, they can deduct the money from their rent.”

“And on that question, the Gent… The Lady moves for passage of Senate Bill 2988. And on that question, the Gentleman from DuPage, Representative Meyer.”

“She indicates she’ll yield.”

“Beg your pardon?”

“Because when tenants rent an apartment or house or whatever from the owner a lot of times the minor repairs and this is only up to $500, the amount of minor repairs on that done, time after time, they’ve requested that the owner make the repairs, sometimes it’s in the winter time and it could be something does not cost that much, but it could be a door, a lock, window, whatever where air is coming through or anything up to $500 and the owner does 09300126.doc 83  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 not do it. They don’t have any recourse and then they have… didn’t have a signed lease that he would take care of the repairs. All this says is that they notify him, if it hasn’t been done in 14 days, they get a valid receipt and they can make the repairs and then they can deduct it from their rent.”

“I can’t hear you.”

“Excuse me. I did not hear.”

“This’ll be our… Could we have some quiet, so we can finish this last Bill.”

“What was your question?”

“There’s a few local, small communities that do have it, but majority of ‘em don’t.”

“Yes, it does.”

“No, it would not.”

“Yes. Yes, they do. Evanston, Urbana…” 09300126.doc 84  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Well, I know of these situations do happen. They happen… they happen, I’ve witnessed some of ‘em in Chicago and I know this does happen. And it’s like I said, up to $500. Now, there are certain… It does not apply to mobile homes, public housing, condominiums, not-for-profit residency and they have a 14-day notice. They cannot do anything until after the 14-day notice and then they have a valid repair slip.”

“What if what?”

“Are you saying someone would deliberately break the lock?”

“It also says it has to be a licensed repairman. I mean, you cannot… I don’t think that that would be the case because it does state in there it has to be a licensed repairman for whatever there… whatever there is to be repaired.”

“Thank you.”

“The Gentleman from Vermilion, Representative Black.”

“She indicates she’ll yield.”

“Well…”

“Representative, the contractor doin’ the repair would be bonded, I would think and he would be liable.”

“The tenant is not doin’ the repair, Representative.”

“Would that be under $500?”

“Well, this is only up to $500.”

“Yes, yes.”

“The… the tenant would be liable.” 09300126.doc 87  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Well, I think the tenant would have to go after the… would have to go on… would have to go after the… the repair person.”

“Well, it does…”

“Well, if… if the tenant did the… if the tenant did the repairs, Representative, he’d have to be a licensed repair person because that’s in the Bill.”

“The tenant would… I would think that… Well, number one, I would think the tenant would be liable. He’d have to… he’d have to get, whatever it is, he’d have to get it from the licensed repairman. But Representative, he has 14… he cannot do anything within 14 days. He cannot tell you that… it’s in the Bill. He cannot tell you, well, I 09300126.doc 89  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 can go and take care of that myself. He has to wait 14 days for you to respond to… for the request of the repair.”

“Thank you, Representative.”

“Representative Hamos.”

“Thank you, Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen. I commend the Sponsor for this very reasonable and important Bill. You know the realtors took no position on this. They’re neutral because they too recognize, as we should, that one of the goals of this Bill is to keep buildings out of housing court and to keep down the dissent between landlords and tenants. Sometimes there really is a small repair that is important to take care of, but the landlord has many other things to do. It doesn’t get… it doesn’t get done and then there’s a build… a strife that is built over that one problem. This allows them to take care of it in a very reasonable way. And the Bill, if you stop and read it, is very tightly written. So, as we just pointed out, there has to be notice, the notice… the tenant has to wait 14 days, so at that time, of course, the landlord can 09300126.doc 90  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 do it as the landlord wants to. Then there is a section on tenants’ liabilities and responsibilities and that says that the tenant has to make sure that the repairs are performed in a workman-like manner; that the supplier has the appropriate valid license; that the… that the tradesman or supplier is adequately insured and the tenant is ultimately responsible and liable for any problems that… that do occur and finally, the tenant has to supply the name of the tradesman or supplier with the bill. So, this is tightly written. It’s for those instances where… where things really can be taken care of in a self-help kind of way with the kind of restrictions that we put into this Bill. And I urge an ‘aye’ vote.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Lady from Cook, Representative Davis, Monique Davis.” Davis, M.: “Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Will the Sponsor yield?”

“She indicates she’ll yield.” Davis, M.: “Representative Jones or Hamos, either, does the owner of the property have to be present when the repairman is there?”

“No.” Davis, M.: “Pardon?”

“No.” Davis, M.: “Does the owner of the property have any say-so about who will be doing the work?”

“No.” Davis, M.: “And you say the owner of the property will only have a two-week notice?” 09300126.doc 91  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

“Fourteen days.” Davis, M.: “That’s two weeks.”

“All day long.” Davis, M.: “Well, I think even most bill collectors give people a 30-day notice. Usually people do have a 30-day notice.”

“This is not a bill collector.” Davis, M.: “Is this the same Bill that is… is it exactly similar to Chicago’s Tenants Residence ordinance?”

“Yes.” Davis, M.: “And if a repair person does something that does not stand up, for example, whatever they repair comes back loose or falls down, who’s liable?”

“I answered that once. I…” Davis, M.: “I’m sorry, I didn’t hear you, Representative.”

“The tenant is liable. He’ll have to get whatever’s necessary from…” Davis, M.: “Does the tenant… does the tenant have insurance for that purpose or is the tenant insured in any way to…”

“Contractors have insurance and this has to be a licensed repair person.” Davis, M.: “The person has to be licensed?”

“Most of ‘em are insured and bonded.” Davis, M.: “Where do they get the repair people? Is there a list that’s provided?”

“I don’t have… No. I don’t have the slightest idea where they would get their repair person from ‘cause I don’t have a slightest idea what the repair is. The repair is only up to $500.” 09300126.doc 92  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 Davis, M.: “Well, $500, Representative, means a lot to some building owners. Some building owners, Representative, are paying thousands of dollars in utility bills and their…”

“Yeah, this one has to be…” Davis, M.: “…escrow…”

“…it has to be $500 or less.” Davis, M.: “…and their escrow for repairs may not be up to 500 for each month or within that 14-day period.”

“You’re absolutely correct.” Davis, M.: “To the Bill, Mr. Speaker.”

“To the Bill.” Davis, M.: “I believe that the shrinking number of affordable houses, especially in Chicago, is based, many times, upon a disregard for landlords and building owners. Many landlords and building owners today are turning their property into condominiums because they do not want the constant abuse of their property or lack of rent payment and then to have the tenant go into court and it be sanctioned by a judge. There are some tenants, not all, but there are some tenants who learn all the ways not to pay rent. They know that by claiming something is not repaired that they can keep from paying rent. So, now, we’re saying not only do you not have to pay rent, but you can bring in a shoddy repair person to perhaps do damage to a building that someone owns and is trying to maintain. I believe that the Representative has the best of intentions. I believe the Representative actually believes that every building owner is fair, is honest, is attempting to provide 09300126.doc 93  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 affordable housing in Chicago and maybe in our state. But I believe movement in this direction is going to continue to create a lack of affordable housing because more landowners are going to turn their property into condominiums. If a landowner is paying property taxes, utility bills, landscapers, snow removal, I believe they should be given an opportunity… Who would wanna keep that building up better than the person who owns it? Who would want to make those repairs on a timely basis better than the person who owns it? But a tenant who is up to absolutely no good, a tenant who has learned the rules of the road would know how every few months to find a major problem so that they could deduct 50 percent of their rent or $500. With all due respect to all the Sponsors of this legislation, I really think it’s a bad Bill. And I urge a ‘no’ vote.”

“Representative Dunkin.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Will the speaker yield?”

“She indicates she’ll yield.”

“To the Bi…”

“I don’t… I don’t that I am or not.”

“To the Bill. Ladies and Gentlemen, this Bill is a pretty straightforward Bill that deals with very minor repairs, again, less than $500. I mean, sometimes, broken doors cost more than that, when they fall off the hinges, depending on what building you have. You have a number of housing experts and associations that support this legislation because it’s so simplified. You have the 09300126.doc 94  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004 National Center on Poverty Law, the Lawyers Committee for Better Housing, the Coalition for the Homeless. You have the Citizens Action Coal… excuse me, the Statewide Housing Action Coalition. You have the business professionals, People for Public Housing. You have the realtors who have no position on this legislation. Again, as one of the other Members pointed out, this helps to avoid unnecessary litigation in the court system when you’re trying to deal with simple or minor repairs. And so, when we have an opportunity for residents who are renting who simply want to make a slight adjustment for under $500 and they know someone who is licensed or insured to do the repair, I think it’s a good measure. I think it’s a measure that does not offend the property owner and it takes care of a simple matter in a housing situation that can benefit both the landlord as well as that tenant who simply needs a minor repair for their respective unit. And I would encourage an ‘aye’ vote.”

Speaker Hannig: “The Gentleman from Cook, Representative Delgado.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move the previous question.”

“The Gentleman moves the previous question. The question is, ‘Shall the main question be put?’ All in favor say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the main question is put. Representative Jones to close.”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I just ask for ‘aye’ vote.” 09300126.doc 95  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “The question is, ‘Shall Senate Bill 2988 pass?’ All in favor vote ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The voting is open. Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Have all voted who wish? Mr. Clerk, take the record. On this question, there are 113 voting ‘yes’ and 3 voting ‘no’. And this Bill, having received a Constitutional Majority, is hereby declared passed. Representative Moffitt, for what reason do you rise?”

“State your point.”

“Representative Scully, for what reason do you rise?”

“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On a matter of personal privilege.”

“State your point.”

“The Commerce & Business Development Committee scheduled for 9:00 Thursday morning is hereby canceled. Thank you.” 09300126.doc 96  STATE OF ILLINOIS 93rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRANSCRIPTION DEBATE 126th Legislative Day 5/12/2004

Speaker Hannig: “Are there any other announcements on committees? Representative Flowers, did you have an announcement? Okay. No announcements. Okay. So, then allowing perfunctory time for the Clerk, Representative Currie moves that the House stands adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, May 13 at the hour of 10 a.m. All in favor of the Motion say ‘aye’; opposed ‘nay’. The ‘ayes’ have it. And the House stands adjourned.”